Comments Thread For: Roach Says a Prime Pacquiao 'Walks Through' Everyone at 147

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fangedgrowl
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2014
    • 2111
    • 126
    • 0
    • 27,903

    #131
    Originally posted by Fangedgrowl
    I think Pac beats Thurmon. I cant get that image of Collazo or Quintana wgich ever one it was landing that body shot on Keith and he retreating fast. Plus Keith really struggled with Poret and Garcia.
    I think Pac's toughest fight would be Crawford for some reason, then Mayweather 2 , then Spence. Spence is big and tough, but i could see Pac stinging him often with shots as he pulled back from throwing Power shots.

    Comment

    • Fangedgrowl
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Mar 2014
      • 2111
      • 126
      • 0
      • 27,903

      #132
      Originally posted by Fangedgrowl
      I think Pac's toughest fight would be Crawford for some reason, then Mayweather 2 , then Spence. Spence is big and tough, but i could see Pac stinging him often with shots as he pulled back from throwing Power shots.
      Porter, wow terrible typing skills today from me.

      Comment

      • The Big Dunn
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2009
        • 69811
        • 9,770
        • 8,091
        • 287,568

        #133
        Originally posted by Fangedgrowl
        I think Pac beats Thurmon. I cant get that image of Collazo or Quintana wgich ever one it was landing that body shot on Keith and he retreating fast. Plus Keith really struggled with Poret and Garcia.
        Fair points. I disagree but he didn't dominate them. Although, as much as I like Danny, I thought he beat Danny clearly and Danny was delusional thinking it was close.

        Comment

        • Fangedgrowl
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Mar 2014
          • 2111
          • 126
          • 0
          • 27,903

          #134
          Originally posted by The Big Dunn
          Fair points. I disagree but he didn't dominate them. Although, as much as I like Danny, I thought he beat Danny clearly and Danny was delusional thinking it was close.
          Would love to see Pac- Spence just for the action and Crawford- Thurmon if dude would ever come back. Winners fight!

          Comment

          • IceTrayDaGang
            Banned.....
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Sep 2017
            • 15597
            • 2,182
            • 703
            • 194,686

            #135
            Originally posted by The Big Dunn
            They only both fought Algieiri, you never brought him up. Spence, TKO 5, Manny UD 12.

            I did look at who prime Manny fought at WW. ODH, Clottey and Cotto (145). You refuse to be honest about where they were relative to the current crop of WW's.

            Crawfrod, Spence and Thurman (when healthy) are top 10 p4p boxers. ODH and Clottey weren't when prime manny fought them. Cotto was, I acknowledged that.

            Because they aren't, you want to bring up wins from a different period then the prime period you outlined, 2008-10. You keep posting size all the time knowing those bigger guys are not boxers at the level Spence, Crawford, Thurman or Danny are.

            Manny is a 1st ballot HOF'er but he isn't a 1st ballot HOF'er @ WW. You just can't accept that. AT ww he is 10-4.
            yeah when did manny fought algieri??? was pac in his "prime"?? what an idiot!!! keyword; "prime"!!!!

            the fighters i brought up when pac fought them, he was in his prime. im comparing those fighters with the one that spence fought!!!

            but you on the other hand, says i cant do that, yet you assumed manny will have problem with spence because of his size and style. which is what you just told me not to do!!

            im bringing up fighters that pac have fought and won! the type of reason why you said spence will beat manny is why i brought those fighters up!! because pac has already fought bigger guys, boxers, etc. and he won!!!! where as for spence, all you are doing here is assuming that his size/style will give pac problems.

            Comment

            • Bronx2245
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2013
              • 28557
              • 5,436
              • 1,424
              • 162,064

              #136
              Originally posted by .WesternChamp.
              and pac beat bradley!! lol!!!! spence or crawford is not on marquez level.. stop fooling yourself.. 2012 is not a "prime" pacquaio.. prime pac walks thru all those guys, its foolish of you to say he wont walk thru danny g, porter??? lmao!!!!!!!!!!!!
              Pac was only 34 in 2012, and Marquez was 39! When do you think Pac was no longer in his prime?

              Comment

              • Bronx2245
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2013
                • 28557
                • 5,436
                • 1,424
                • 162,064

                #137
                Originally posted by .WesternChamp.
                28-34? lmao!!! 7 years in his prime? with his fighting style? lmao!!!! when pac fought cotto, pac was 30!! that's when he was in his prime. pac at 34, is when he fought rios, that's after the marquez ko.. so pac was still in his prime to you around that time? you trippin'! lol
                34 is still PRIME to me! If Pac was so good when he beat Cotto, he wouldn't have needed a 145 lb. catch-weight! Lol! Floyd beat Oscar and Cotto at 154, no catch-weight, and Floyd is older than Cotto!

                Comment

                • Lion81
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Oct 2018
                  • 2014
                  • 101
                  • 179
                  • 45,005

                  #138
                  He was a roided cheat, that's why.

                  Comment

                  • Bronx2245
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2013
                    • 28557
                    • 5,436
                    • 1,424
                    • 162,064

                    #139
                    Originally posted by .WesternChamp.
                    and marquez didnt destroyed a prime pac.. marquez was getting whooped on before he knocked pac out!!! you trippin'!!
                    Didn't Marquez drop Pac in the 2nd too? Oh, that part! Don't forget Marquez was 39 in 2012, when he decapitated 34 year old PRIME Manny!

                    Comment

                    • flojspot80
                      Up and Comer
                      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                      • Jan 2014
                      • 90
                      • 17
                      • 1
                      • 7,645

                      #140
                      Originally posted by The Big Dunn
                      If you don't get the difference between Spence and Clottey then there is no point to keep discussing this. Manny beat stand still bums. Spence is not that. Clottey was never seen as one of the 5-7 best fighters in the world like Spence.

                      It's me taking into consideration everything. Again, prime WW manny fought 35 yr old ODH, and Clottey at 147 and Cotto at 145 (who didn't have his trainer because he went with Manny).

                      That isn't a resume that indicates in his prime he's running through Spence, Thurman, Porter and Danny.

                      COTTO AT 147 canT beat many at 145 he was knock down like 2 or 3 times...I BET MY HOUSE HE CANT BEAT MANNY AT 147 if that's what you are trying to imply.
                      Last edited by flojspot80; 10-26-2018, 01:12 PM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP