Sam Peter – “I’m The Only Real Heavyweight Contender”

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bozo_no no
    Palabras de Piedra
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Apr 2005
    • 8906
    • 416
    • 496
    • 16,069

    #41
    Originally posted by j
    bozo, you're in the extremely small minority here thinking that all knockdowns were legal.

    it's not us you should be worried about.

    Yea, and you notice how it's the same 5 of you that haven't posted almost anything in this forum since the last time it was discussed?

    There isn't a debate here. There's what happened and those who are unable to deal with it.


    Talking about a 'majority' in a Klitschko related topic is quite funny, considering it's the same 5-10 people who will agree with eachother no matter what's being discussed.

    Comment

    • Hitman932
      I LOVE Euro Fighters!!
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 14910
      • 1,180
      • 836
      • 28,259

      #42
      sam peter is a fat ass. the fact of the matter is that he has regressed since the wlad fight, while wlad has moved forward.

      lets not forget a couple things.

      sam peter was so fat for the robert hawkins fight that he ripped his trunks down the seam of the ass.

      while wlad was training and fighting for the heavyweight title sam peter was taking on a guy who may not even be one of the top 250 guys the 7-foot freak show heavyweight julius long. who by the way went down and stayed down after a glancing blow.

      anything sam peter says about himself is nothing but hot air until he does something to actually prove it in the ring. his best win was agianst taurus sykes, who was knocked out more impressively by antonio bryant, who is a journeyman small heavy by the way.


      for duva to criticize other heavues for terrible TV fights is beyond hilarious. Sam Peters last two fights have been the two biggest televised jokes that i can recall off hand.

      Comment

      • mECHsLAVE
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Mar 2005
        • 1419
        • 137
        • 105
        • 7,736

        #43
        LOL @ Bozo.

        All that spin and elaboration and you mix just enough truth with lies to even confuse yourself. You contradicted yourself (as you normally do when you try to spin lies into truth) because you admitted Peter hit him with a rabbit punch in the 5th to knock him down. Yes, Wlad got hit with a big punch right before that- but he wasn't knocked down, or even wobbled, and he clinched and then was then hit squarely to the back of the head by a huge right hand- an illegal blow, as you admitted. So how can you get knocked down from a foul (and one of the worst- rabbit punches are very dangerous)? You can't. It's like saying Golota's low blows should have been legal and those knockdowns should have been legit because Bowe was already hurt and beat up. LOL You can't score knockdowns with fouls, it's as simple as that. And you can't score knockdowns without landing punches, either ("knockdown" #2).

        The first two knockdowns were completely bogus and the third one was legit, very impressive that late in the fight, and even more impressive was that Wlad came back from it to have Peter stumbling around the ring, a bloody swollen mess, in the last round.

        I know I'm preaching to the choir, for the most part. I don't know of anyone here who doesn't know about Bozo's biases and spin-doctoring. As a matter of fact, I don't know of anyone else who thinks those knockdowns were legit. It's simple boxing rules- you can't score a knockdown with a foul and you can't score one without landing a punch, either. Simple, simple, simple. Boxing 101. Bozo, I want you to go put on your Dunce Cap, and hold the push-up position until I get tired and say you can stop. Ready.... GO!

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP