Tweet
-
-
Lol source? -
Hearn said he did numbers lower than.. but in line and close to what he did on showtime in the Parker fight.
You're talking waffle.Comment
-
cant post stuff like this with no source manComment
-
I mean if it did...so what? New platform, mobile based, no one in the UK uses it.
People acting like theres a guy who attracts more attention and money in the sport than AJ. The guy has endorsement deals with some of the leading brands out there and earns more from that than all American fighters combined do from fighting.
So relax, he is ok.Comment
-
Joshua-Parker averaged 346K live and 430K on replay with Showtime. DAZN doesn't even have a quarter of that number's subscribers. Silly little Eddie Hearn fanboy.Originally posted by yammy25 View PostComment
-
Hot damn! DAZN is paying all that money To Eddie Hearn when nobody is even subscribing or watching the live streaming service. They did some very poor research in following the latest sports marketing trends in U.S. Boxing.
Boxing is no longer a mainstream sport in America anymore. Hell it's hard enough to find boxing on cable and it's at least 10X as hard to find boxing off the internet, unless your a boxing fan.
I never thought that streaming boxing live online was a good marketing tool in order to attract new fans and broaden its audience among the casual mainstream viewer. It was a very risky venture to begin with.
Comment
-
Who told you this?Comment
-
That's still better than Wildher vs Fury, they sold only 10k tickets
15k>10k
Comment
-
And if I'm not mistaken it was only shown on DAZN in the U.S. and Canada. Other countries had it on TV. I don't know why it's hard for people to believe an afternoon fight in the U.S. on a streaming service 99% of the people haven't heard of did low numbers. If it cracked 50,000 that would surprise the hell out of meOriginally posted by Pigeons View PostComment
Comment