Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Golovkin Not Happy With WBC's Decision on Canelo's Title

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Yes I think Canelo will not give Charlo a shot until he has take a risk and wins vs GGG or Jacobs. I have have to agree Charli needs to shut up and step up. GGG aka Triple No Juevos will avoid him so Charlo has to force a Jacobs fight or even a Munguia fight will get the GGG huggers on his side.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Muz View Post
      More racism vs the superior Eastern European Russian fighters. If it goes to decision in Vegas, the Mexican or African American will win by default to preserve this last ditch effort to keep boxing politics centered in North America. Truth is the best fighters in the world are from the east, which many racist blacks can't have happen. Usa boxing establishment knows the deal, they lose their fighters they are out of boxing power broking so you have fixed fights to protect the Mexican and black fanbase. Usa Caucasians don't give a crap about boxing, so fighters like ggg Loma and Usyk will always be the biggest threat to the USA establishment.

      Just read the weak ghetto culture propaganda on these boards literally drinking up the pro black look aid and anti white rhetoric. It is laughable.
      You probably watch ancient aliens and read into conspiracy theories too much. You're completely delusional, see a psychiatrist.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by stealthradon View Post
        I am not gone, and you still haven't answered my question, you fúcking bítch snake, with no balls.
        Grow some and then get back to me, you pathetic spineless little punk.
        Just so you know I respect your opinion even if we simply disagree. You aren't like the other golovCUCKS.

        Peace breh and my thread ain't ripping you although it does reexamine 1st fight, peds, 2nd fight, etc

        Comment


        • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
          All I do is



          Immortalized.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Lomadeaux View Post
            How? By beating Canelo twice?
            You can live in your little fantasy world where Golovkin beat
            Canelo, but in reality, Golovkin is winless against Canelo.

            Golovkin proved to be a battyman instead of a bogeyman
            by deciding to 'run' and fight defensively in the rematch
            after having relentlessly needled Canelo for using a similar
            strategy during their first fight.

            Golovkin was not questioning Canelo's heritage when he
            talked about 'Mexican style', Golovkin was questioning
            Canelo's manhood. Now fans are questioning Golovkin's
            manhood.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by yankees7448 View Post
              Immortalized.
              Where was the racist part?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                btw, kid...... you made the hall of shame


                Category 1 dumb fcuks (in denial).....

                yankees7448
                Diego Rodriguez
                TonyGE
                stealthradon

                Category #2 dumb fcuks (hiding in shame).....

                maxi
                kafkod
                progressive_jedi
                steve_plunger


                you are a winner






                Those lists are way too short!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Lemonhead_Jeff View Post
                  Where was the racist part?


                  I do not have a racist bone in my body, everyone who matters knows

                  I immortalized that fool in my sig, for making yet another DUMB excuse to protect Hypekin..... so what did he do?..... exactly, he attempted to pull the race card

                  then he lied about the context of that quote, to make it fit lol

                  My point was that at the time GGG was more popular in Europe than in the US thus fighting in Europe was a very lucrative option.
                  that was NOT his point, and it was not the context of that particular conversation

                  I stand by everything I said

                  he is just an excuse-making muppet

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Lemonhead_Jeff View Post
                    Those lists are way too short!



                    that was just to get the ball rolling

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Lemonhead_Jeff View Post
                      You can live in your little fantasy world where Golovkin beat
                      Canelo, but in reality, Golovkin is winless against Canelo.

                      Golovkin proved to be a battyman instead of a bogeyman
                      by deciding to 'run' and fight defensively in the rematch
                      after having relentlessly needled Canelo for using a similar
                      strategy during their first fight.

                      Golovkin was not questioning Canelo's heritage when he
                      talked about 'Mexican style', Golovkin was questioning
                      Canelo's manhood. Now fans are questioning Golovkin's
                      manhood.
                      Very few people on this forum except you and a couple of other people that specialise in Bull **** question Golovkin's manhood. Even you don't really believe that. You dreamed up what you thought was a zinger to get under Golovkin's fans skin not realizing it made you look rather dumb.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP