Yes I think Canelo will not give Charlo a shot until he has take a risk and wins vs GGG or Jacobs. I have have to agree Charli needs to shut up and step up. GGG aka Triple No Juevos will avoid him so Charlo has to force a Jacobs fight or even a Munguia fight will get the GGG huggers on his side.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin Not Happy With WBC's Decision on Canelo's Title
Collapse
-
-
You probably watch ancient aliens and read into conspiracy theories too much. You're completely delusional, see a psychiatrist.More racism vs the superior Eastern European Russian fighters. If it goes to decision in Vegas, the Mexican or African American will win by default to preserve this last ditch effort to keep boxing politics centered in North America. Truth is the best fighters in the world are from the east, which many racist blacks can't have happen. Usa boxing establishment knows the deal, they lose their fighters they are out of boxing power broking so you have fixed fights to protect the Mexican and black fanbase. Usa Caucasians don't give a crap about boxing, so fighters like ggg Loma and Usyk will always be the biggest threat to the USA establishment.
Just read the weak ****** culture propaganda on these boards literally drinking up the pro black look aid and anti white rhetoric. It is laughable.Comment
-
Just so you know I respect your opinion even if we simply disagree. You aren't like the other golovCUCKS.
Peace breh and my thread ain't ripping you although it does reexamine 1st fight, peds, 2nd fight, etcComment
-
-
You can live in your little fantasy world where Golovkin beat
Canelo, but in reality, Golovkin is winless against Canelo.
Golovkin proved to be a battyman instead of a bogeyman
by deciding to 'run' and fight defensively in the rematch
after having relentlessly needled Canelo for using a similar
strategy during their first fight.
Golovkin was not questioning Canelo's heritage when he
talked about 'Mexican style', Golovkin was questioning
Canelo's manhood. Now fans are questioning Golovkin's
manhood.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
I do not have a racist bone in my body, everyone who matters knows
I immortalized that fool in my sig, for making yet another DUMB excuse to protect Hypekin..... so what did he do?..... exactly, he attempted to pull the race card
then he lied about the context of that quote, to make it fit lol
that was NOT his point, and it was not the context of that particular conversationMy point was that at the time GGG was more popular in Europe than in the US thus fighting in Europe was a very lucrative option.
I stand by everything I said
he is just an excuse-making muppetComment
-
Comment
-
Very few people on this forum except you and a couple of other people that specialise in Bull **** question Golovkin's manhood. Even you don't really believe that. You dreamed up what you thought was a zinger to get under Golovkin's fans skin not realizing it made you look rather dumb.You can live in your little fantasy world where Golovkin beat
Canelo, but in reality, Golovkin is winless against Canelo.
Golovkin proved to be a battyman instead of a bogeyman
by deciding to 'run' and fight defensively in the rematch
after having relentlessly needled Canelo for using a similar
strategy during their first fight.
Golovkin was not questioning Canelo's heritage when he
talked about 'Mexican style', Golovkin was questioning
Canelo's manhood. Now fans are questioning Golovkin's
manhood.Comment




Comment