In my opinion he doesn't really deserve a shot against either guy because his opposition was weak and he's been relatively inactive. The selection of his opponents was mandated by the WBC so I won't fault him on that. But it's not my opinion that decides his future. It's the WBC. They set down what was required to fight for the title. He did those things. Now they won't honor their part. He played the game following their rules. Now the WBC changes them. There are millions of dollars at stake here. I'm perplexed as to why real Charlo fans are not upset. If Golovkin is going to fight Charlo obviously it's better sooner than later because he is aging. If he beats Charlo then he could fight Canelo in the spring or he could just give up and fight in Japan and then retire.
This has been going on for generations & just cuz its happening again it only matters to the Triple L fans cuz ya'll don't want Triple L to lose. Triple L has received the same weak mandatories as the ones Jermall had to knock off to get to the ranks so why is it a problem when Nelo gets a easy defense when every champion has one time or another especially Triple L? I don't like the fake shet in boxing that's why I'm here jumpin on ya'll like flies on shet….LMMFAO! Especially if I pay for a PPV Event where one guy is just a hype machine, F that! I want to pay for quality opponents fighting each other. Don't you want quality for your buck?
If he loses so what? He was in line for life changing money...if he loses, he ain't seeing Canelo. He'll be relegated to fighting for peanuts on under cards again. I think it's funny that charlo is getting ripped off and nobody seems to care. not sure when this fight will take place tho since ggg was talking about resting til may. Canelo will probably get another soft touch by the time he has to fight either guy.
You didn't care for Jermall when Triple L had the belts & he was the mandatory now did you? Jermall is FAR from boke, the dude got a home & cars paid off. He's good & will be good so I'm not worried about that man cuz god blessed him.
If he loses so what? He was in line for life changing money...if he loses, he ain't seeing Canelo. He'll be relegated to fighting for peanuts on under cards again. I think it's funny that charlo is getting ripped off and nobody seems to care. not sure when this fight will take place tho since ggg was talking about resting til may. Canelo will probably get another soft touch by the time he has to fight either guy.
so fkn what..... ?
if he loses..... he doesn't DESERVE that Canelo money
Hypekin already had two paydays, and he LOST to Canelo.....
let Charlo fight the loser to determine who gets the pot of gold
aboutfkntime those guys took a risk to carve their path in this sport
The only fights I think are better are ggg vs Canelo, Jacobs and possibly bjs...all of who are probably tougher fights. I have no problem at all with ggg vs charlo, I do have a problem with the wbc doing what they did...regardless who it does or doesn't favour.
bullshlt you fluffer
You just don't wanna see ggg get beat, that's what it's about.
FACT: there is nothing wrong with Golovkin/Charlo
you are simply here making the same crybaby excuses for Hypekin that you were making for Joshua lol
You just don't wanna see ggg get beat, that's what it's about.
FACT: there is nothing wrong with Golovkin/Charlo
you are simply here making the same crybaby excuses for Hypekin that you were making for Joshua lol
Don't want to see him get beat by fighting guys you all say beat him? They are all more established and proven then charlo, so tell me how that works.
Again, my op was about the wbc arbitrarily taking charlos mandatory status away...you're the one who made that into something about ggg. Wtf is wrong with you anyway?
...because he was already mandated to get that shot...until the wbc decided otherwise😂
so what ?
his path is now clear
and so is Hypekin's
the fact that Charlo now has to beat a live dog to earn the right to fight a champion who happens to be a HUGE superstar and HUGE payday..... is no problem
and the fact that Golovkin now has to beat a live dog to earn the right to fight a champion who happens to be a HUGE superstar and HUGE payday..... is no problem either
you are just making silly excuses to protect Golovkin, just like you were making silly excuses to protect Joshua
the fact that Charlo now has to beat a live dog to earn the right to fight a champion who happens to be a HUGE superstar and HUGE payday..... is no problem
and the fact that Golovkin now has to beat a live dog to earn the right to fight a champion who happens to be a HUGE superstar and HUGE payday..... is no problem either
you are just making silly excuses to protect Golovkin, just like you were making silly excuses to protect Joshua
I actually agree with all of that...except the trash at the end. The problem I have is with the wbc moving the goal posts after this guy was already supposed to be their mandatory challenger. Sanctioning bodies should at least pretend like they act with integrity...this type of thing is why people think the sport is a joke.
I actually agree with all of that...except the trash at the end. The problem I have is with the wbc moving the goal posts after this guy was already supposed to be their mandatory challenger. Sanctioning bodies should at least pretend like they act with integrity...this type of thing is why people think the sport is a joke.
there is no bullshlt with me
how about you try to match that
FACT: there is nothing wrong with Golovkin/Charlo..... so, the WBC changed their mind..... so what?
both of those guys should FINALLY fight a live dog, in order to earn the HUGE payday that comes with fighting Canelo
if you feel so outraged for Charlo now, why were you not outraged when Golovkin passed him over TWICE to fight Canelo?..... the situation is exactly the same, because he was Golovkin's mandatory
hard luck for Charlo and Golovkin, they both need to step up their game and fight live dogs instead of looking for handouts.....
Comment