Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Loeffler Will Speak To Golovkin About Charlo Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by j.razor View Post
    Big name? LMMFAO! FOH with that flat out LIE....LMMFAO! WE WANT

    Jermall vs golovkin!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1F-bbT0qLg
    what n the hell is wrong with these guys? they complain Charlo hasnt fought anyone and then when the opportunity comes for him to step it up they call for him to fight LEMIUX????????? so that they can complain for another year about how he doesn't fight anyone??????????

    Comment


    • Originally posted by trueblood View Post
      I can't believe you can't see the double fix...

      Oscar..You are Sooooo Slick... And Suliman..
      WHAT AN whole licker...

      GGG champ had Charlo mandatory...

      Suliman & Oscar get together. Remember Lil Red puss did not want his belt REMEMBER..

      Now lets do that December thing with???

      Let me see CHARLO? NAAAA Lets fight David LA PEWWW

      & screw some more money out of the fools that will buy this one.


      Jermall vs golovkin!!

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1F-bbT0qLg

      Comment


      • Originally posted by bigdunny1 View Post
        The WBC made this move because Loeffler cried to them and submitted a official request begging them to bump Charlo and mandate a 3rd fight.

        http://wbcboxing.com/wbceng/news/113...ch-with-canelo

        Tom Loeffler, who's Promoter of Gennady Golovkin, will be asking the World Boxing Council to grant a direct rematch with new WBC middleweight champion Saúl "Canelo" Alvarez.

        The request will coincide with the WBC's mandatory defences session. At the Ratings Committee at its Convention in Kiev Ukraine, Tom said: "We thought the judging of the fight, didn't reflect what happened in the fight"

        "We are going to make a request for a rematch"


        This has NOTHING to do with Canelo or Golden Boy. WBC were ready to make Charlo Canelo's mandatory after his voluntary defense. Then puzzzy boy Loeffler crying and making formal requests to jump the line ahead of Charlo. WBC could of EASILY told GGG kick rocks Charlo was already mandatory he is next in May and you can do what many fighters have done after a loss...work your way back up the rankings. Instead WBC actually helping GGG by telling him Canelo is fighting in Dec you fight Charlo and if you win you get Canelo in May. If anyone should be upset it's Charlo because now he has to fight GGG to get his spot all because of GGG's whining. But this has NOTHING to do with Golden Boy or Canelo who have not even been in contact with the WBC this is happening because GGG cried to the WBC begging them to leap frog Charlo.
        I get all this but the WBC could've easily told Loeffler to fck off and adhere by their rules. telling Charlo to "earn" the Canelo fight is just messed up and foul when he already has that right. giving Canelo a voluntary is one thing, I don't care about that. the part that stinks is telling a mandatory he has to "earn" a title shot. Charlo should be allowed to just sit and wait until Canelo has his voluntary.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Truth Serum View Post
          But Golovkin beat Canelo twice now and the WBC doesn't want him to win a 3rd time! If that were to happen no more cash cow and no more PPVs for Canelo! See how this business works?
          You mean the time they robbed Jacobs after Jacobs beat Triple L?

          Jermall vs golovkin!!!!

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1F-bbT0qLg

          Comment


          • Originally posted by alexjust View Post
            Appreciate it I'm also seeking out reason on this forum, but for the most part it feels like looking for a needle in a haystack.
            WE WANT

            Jermall vs golovkin!!!!

            Try to reason THAT!

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Illmatic94 View Post
              I get all this but the WBC could've easily told Loeffler to fck off and adhere by their rules. telling Charlo to "earn" the Canelo fight is just messed up and foul when he already has that right. giving Canelo a voluntary is one thing, I don't care about that. the part that stinks is telling a mandatory he has to "earn" a title shot. Charlo should be allowed to just sit and wait until Canelo has his voluntary.
              I agree. WBC should of told cry baby Loeffler *** off Charlo get's the Cinco De Mayo fight. Just making it clear that we are down this road because of puzzzy boy Loeffler and the constant crying from the GGG camp. Golden Boy or Canelo didn't ask for this. After 2 fights and all the tears and excuses from GGG I'm fine seeing Canelo/Charlo instead. You have to be on drugs if you think after not being able to make any adjustments and getting his face broken that a year later GGG will be better. He took a lot of punishment and will be diminished while Canelo get's better and will be even more comfortable at 160. It's a blood bath whenever the 3rd fight happens. Give me Canelo/Charlo which might happen in May anyway if GGG ducks.

              Comment


              • There's no other choice for Glovkin.
                I don't think Saunders would be interested now that lil G is belt-less.
                Of course Gennady would say yes to a Charlo fight.
                Biggest question is would Charlo want a piece of this monster?

                Comment


                • Originally posted by kafkod View Post
                  And I'm starting to understand that you are an idiot.

                  Goodbye.
                  Your opinion of me is irrelevant and amusing since you proudly
                  display the photos of two mentally ill people on your profile.

                  Good riddance.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Real King Kong View Post
                    I don't think charlo has many real fans, cuz I haven't seen a single post protesting charlo having to fight for something he already had. you're right tho, ggg losing is far more important to some of these people than charlo advancing his career and getting a huge payday/shot at the title...and it's only cuz they feel like ggg is there for the taking.

                    all in all it's a good fight and charlo probably needs to earn that spot a little more anyway...but it's just a really bad look for the wbc to go back on what they've already ruled and start changing the rules. it would have looked better if they just granted canelo the option to rematch ggg and gave an extension for the mandatory imo. at the end of the day, charlo deserves his shot first, cuz he "earned" that position according to the wbc.
                    I have mixed feelings about Charlo. The two fights he took at Middle were mandated so he has no control over that. On the other hand he's been inactive. Appears to be a KO puncher but really at Middle who knows? The WBC are ruining the sport. Letting Canelo to habitually fight over his weigh limit and keep his JM status and now sticking it to Charlo.

                    Comment


                    • I would love to see Charlo and Golovkin fight. And I think canelo wants to do a trilogy fight next year. Fare enough. But if he wants to fight in December for a title defense then that is his perogative. Yet fighting another Golovkin victim seems a moot point. If Charlo was next in line to fight a mando with Golovkin, why is he being hop-scotched over by Lemieux for a belt that Canelo now has?! Lemieux is utter dog **** at top level and his brand is wearing thin to fans that actually keep up with the sport. In all fairness to Charlo, he deserves his title shot and imo its his time to step up and prove his mettle as an elite fighter. Win or lose, he will make a boatload of money, and there is always a DJ and possibly a Golovkin fight in his future.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP