How it could work for DAZN to show a Canelo fight, even against Lemieux. Doesnt have to have anything to do with Hearn. Canelo card would be a seperate entity. What is a Canelo fights value to new subscribers brought in, and unsubscribers?
Would 3 million pay for a $10 Canelo PPV?
Collapse
-
-
DAZN isnt Hearn only. They can deal with whoever they like. Theres nothing stopping them from valuing $30mil on a Canelo fight against new subscribers, hed keep 100% off gate and the rest aswellComment
-
Do you mean an extra $10 vs the $10 one would already have to be paying for DAZN? Or just $10 one time for one event & its on DAZN as some whole different thing then the regular stuff on DAZN?
I don't see why you couldn't do that as long as you can make the $30M (in this case) or w/e amount pay the fighters purses + give the needed profit for the people behind the scenes/promoters/DAZN.
Idk if thats a thing with streaming platforms yet or not tbh but I could see it happening. Its basically like what HBO did. HBO boxing was just HBO for a long time. Then they started doing HBO PPV to so if you were a fan of said PPV fighter already you were likely paying whatever a month for HBO PLUS the $50+ for the PPV of same fighter. Double dipping a lil bit.Comment
-
Logic would be to let Hearn do the deal as part of his billion though. I would love him to sign so I get to see him in U.K. But in reality I just think They would have to overpay for him given they won't recoup anything from mexicoComment
-
Nah no extra, just a one shot. How much value would Canelo add to them. Lets say they give him $30mil for a card vs Lemieux. How many new subscribers does that bring in, lets say 33% dont unsubscribe. Does it cover the $30mil.Do you mean an extra $10 vs the $10 one would already have to be paying for DAZN? Or just $10 one time for one event & its on DAZN as some whole different thing then the regular stuff on DAZN?
I don't see why you couldn't do that as long as you can make the $30M (in this case) or w/e amount pay the fighters purses + give the needed profit for the people behind the scenes/promoters/DAZN.
Idk if thats a thing with streaming platforms yet or not tbh but I could see it happening. Its basically like what HBO did. HBO boxing was just HBO for a long time. Then they started doing HBO PPV to so if you were a fan of said PPV fighter already you were likely paying whatever a month for HBO PLUS the $50+ for the PPV of same fighter. Double dipping a lil bit.
The $10 PPV idea is great though, but it goes against theyre entire ethosComment
-
Showtime have a lot of commitments to boxers at the moment and haymon has a pretty good relationship with espinosa and i don't think oscar and goldenboy can just dance in and take all the cream.
Maybe there is no market in the us for a canelo type paycheck...you just saw his 2nd fight with golovkin only did just over 1 million and HBO are huge compared with showtime.
Maybe they will have explore all avenues to see where they can get the best exposure.....maybe he will demand too much money.
I think things have got cloudy now HBO have retired from the scene especially in the USComment
-
We know that both Showtime and ESPN has PPV distribution but DAZN does not. Their Pay per view distributor is Sky Sports; Which I have heard by the way that the American based cable giant Comcast is interested in acquiring. If that happens that could put the DAZN out of business.Comment
Comment