PBC PPV's are about to become a thing
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
I'm good with the December and January PPVs, those were always going to be PPV fights.
But this one why? Sure it is two potentially top 5-6 P4P fighters in their primes, but Mikey has business left at 135 to take care of and we should be getting Spence/Porter. I mean if Porter wants to wait until spring time, then why not fight your mandatory in Ugas? And really this will end up being a lose-lose for him unless he completely obliterates Mikey. As for Mikey? If he wins then he will make a STRONG case for being P4P #1 fighter in the world, but if he loses and gets punished then we lose out on the Lomachenko fight and he may never be the same fighter again. Best case scenario that keeps both fighters stock relatively on the same level is a 9-3 type of decision win for Spence or late stoppage in a fairly competitive fight.Comment
-
Comment
-
Agree.
I'd rather PBC just do an app vs selling me a monthly PPV.
$10 vs $60+ a month makes $10 a month look super reasonable. I thought we were gonna have a subscription service vs free & basic cable battle.
Looks like we are getting a battle of classic PPV & this new hybrid PPV model.
Idk if PBC is doing a PPV a month or not, but the early word was we were getting 2 PPV's a year & we got 3 PPV's in the first 3 months of this new deal coming into play. Not a good sign.
I thought we were about to save some money, but looks like we are gonna be paying more with 2 subscription services & a sh^t load of PPV's.Comment
Comment