Don't a lot of people here break apart top guys' (or not so top guys) performances good & bad? What worked or didn't work? What they may or may not have done in preparation for a fight? Who's helpful or not in their corner?
I don't see whats wrong with that for any fighter. Some of you guys just got this weird fanboy or hater type behavior with specific guys & are far too invested in who wins or loses & wanna hype guys off of wins & sh^t on them when they lose. I don't think the average reasonable & quality boxing fan here digests the sport quite like that while still having guys or styles they do enjoy more than other guys or styles.
you missed the 'he needs a new trainer' excuse aswell, ive seen that countless times for broner, he just needs a trainer to tell him to throw some more punches apparantly
No idea why you included Mayweather and Davis. This should be exclusively for Broner.
Did you not see the Floyd vs Conor thread? His fans was saying Floyd didn't even train for that fight and that's why Conor was able to last until the 10th round. And Davis is included because they started saying Davis need to separate himself from Broner if he wants to be successful. So the excuses is already there for when Davis falls short it's because of Broner's bad influence.
you missed the 'he needs a new trainer' excuse aswell, ive seen that countless times for broner, he just needs a trainer to tell him to throw some more punches apparantly
You right, that's another one.
"He needs a strict trainer that will not put up with his shit"
Comment