Wilder v Fury 2 Way Rematch Clause?

[Madison Boxing]

Well let’s just hope the first fighting isn’t boring as fck!

Will be interesting how many tune in to be honest, fury always has boring as fck fights so unless undercard is strong I doubt I’ll be watching it myself live. (Plus I like my sleep!)

yeah i wont be paying. i dont think a lot of UK fans will be to be honest, i was having a look at the comments of the casuals on sports bible facebook page and most of them are calling it a sham fight and saying negative things. people wont be getting up at 4am and paying for the ppv.

[jglvz256]

I have been telling you guys that joshua IS NOT fighting wilder April/2019 since his ring interview after povetkin win!!

If Wilder and Fury both have rematch clauses then they are guaranteed to fight a second time whatever the outcome, yes? Therefore it is impossible for Joshua to fight Wilder in April.

[jglvz256]

Btw, what happened to the promotional tour that was starting today?

[S.jenkz]

he did. hearn still refused to do the fight. which is why wilder has moved on with his life.

wilder left it so late to reply AJ was forced into a mandatory

[N/A]

You mean to say this is the first you've heard about them having a mutual rematch clause? With all you seem to know about the inner workings of it all through your sources and media contacts?

I was the one that said it was likely a two fight deal weeks ago.

[saintpat]

If Wilder and Fury both have rematch clauses then they are guaranteed to fight a second time whatever the outcome, yes? Therefore it is impossible for Joshua to fight Wilder in April.

Not necessarily. The losing side will have a period — maybe 90 days — to decide whether to exercise it.

Just like Wlad had time to consider whether he wanted a second fight with AJ.

That could be sorted out well in time for an April date for the winner for a fight with Joshua.

[sicko]

UH...OK? WTF is the problem? Fury and Wilder don't have to work their careers around AJ f_cking Schedule!

[yammy25]

I was the one that said it was likely a two fight deal weeks ago.

So why have you continued to take the stance of going on about Hearn / AJ etc not wanting the fight etc even for April if you've been operating under the assumption or knowledge that it would never take place due to a two fight deal for fury / wilder?

You're supposed to be educating and telling the truth? So why haven't you been persistently stating yoir belief with your posts that an April fight absolutely isn't going to happen due to a mutual rematch clause , instead of just talking your usual "Hearn lies..he doesn't want wilder in April, it'll be Whyte" etc.

You absolutely have not stated in your posts that have anything to do with AJ and wilder in April, that everything in those posts isn't or may not be relevant because your belief is that a fight would be impossible anyway due to a wilder / fury mutual rematch clause. But you're the boxing expert so you should know that.. if that's your belief..an April fight would not be possible.

You still won't answer why you lied to another poster about the length of your original account 😂😂

Why did you lie and state that your account was active for many years when it in fact wasn't? This will be the third time I have asked you..and you consistently dodge it.

[zok310]

This is a duck any way you dice or slice it. Holy ****, why would Wilder give a voluntary a rematch? Has this ever been done by a hw champion?
Wilder clearly avoiding AJ for as long as possible if this is true.

[paulf]

That's not how that works.

If one of them gets sparked out early or loses a wide decision, they probably won't want to enforce the rematch clause. See: Lucian Bute.