Originally posted by robbyheartbaby
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Saunders: Canelo Win Was NO Robbery, Can't Really Cry Over It
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Mindgames View PostAll this "doninated, broke him mentally with bodyshots by round two, Golovkin ran away" bull****, when the rest of the world saw a good tough fight between two hard men. What fools of themselves these vendetta posters are making of themselves 😂
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by j.razor View PostYou fooled yourself when you said Triple L won the 1st fight & you fooled yourself when you said Triple L would win the 2nd fight....LMMFAO!
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostTwo fights and not one GGG fan has expressed disdain over the fact that GGG did not fight the way that he proclaimed himself to fight. He did not fight as if he was the monster that they proclaimed him to be. Master at cutting off the ring? KO artist?
If you ask me, all the talk of corruption, bad judging, robbery, etc is just misplaced disappointment that GGG wasn't who they wanted him to be.
This is all tears and excuses from a fan base that was duped and cant come to grips with GGG not being what you pretended he was. Excuse making for GGG's short comings.Last edited by bigdunny1; 09-18-2018, 08:30 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postthat is simply not true
MOST of the controversy, is caused by a lack of understanding regarding the official scoring criteria
e.g.
in the rematch, regarding the 4 official criteria..... I think Canelo won ALL of them
clean hard punching
effective aggression
ring generalship
defence
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robi13 View PostAlthough ggg agression was ineffective in fight number one, you can give him that in fight one.. Canelo takes the other three criteria in fight one. Canelo should be 2-0 vs triple jab
Comment
Comment