Comments Thread For: Saunders: Canelo Win Was NO Robbery, Can't Really Cry Over It

[j.razor]

Anyone who calls a good fighter silly names hasn't really got any credence to their opinions. I thought Golovkin would win but if i was right about every fight id be a millionaire. Thats alot different than being biased going in and hating someone i dont know for personal reasons. Theres medication for that sort of thing 😂

It sounds like you butt hurt when I call him Triple L....lmmfao! Triple mutha-***an L....LMMFAO!! Credence to my opinions? Go look at my track record homie, that's credence for you....LMMFAO!!!!

[j.razor]

Your one brick short of a load.. By the way what kind of jackass takes on the name SOG..Talk about an ego problem and massive disrespect....

You can just keep on fakin' da funk....LMMFAO!

[bigdunny1]

But he's OLD! That's the new excuse anyway, since none of the others work now.

yup first it was Jacobs cheated he re hydrated too much. Then it was Canelo moved too much woulnd't fight Mexican Style. Now it's well please please bow down to GGG's pitty pat jabs and ignore him getting a Mexican Style azzz whooping and face rearranged. Oh yeah the old excuse is coming next. Especially if they fight a 3rd time GGG would take even more punishment and likely KO'd and the excuse is oh he was just too old. Reality he was a killer against bums the first moment he stopped fighting bums he couldn't KO anybody anymore and went killer to scared jabber.

[aboutfkntime]

Although ggg agression was ineffective in fight number one, you can give him that in fight one.. Canelo takes the other three criteria in fight one. Canelo should be 2-0 vs triple jab

I probably agree, but have no problem with the draw

[aboutfkntime]

Public pressure got to Canelo to fight Lara, Trout, and GGG. Canelo was victorious in all of them thanks to having at least one judge in his pocket. The recent fight was a draw in my eyes at least.

While Canelo could have been fighting Andrade, he was fighting Angulo, Kirkland, Khan, and Liam Smith. He ducked GGG for 2 years until he saw him begin to slip. Canelo is good but will never be great. Floyd showed us that, and getting caught juicing is a black eye that will never go away.

No hate, just telling it like it is.

Andrade was a nobody during most of that reign

stop talking bollocks

Golovkin has.....
1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) egg on his face
4) lumps on his face

[robbyheartbaby]

He outboxed him in the 1st fight then beat the crap out of him in the 2nd fight....LOL

I don't know you find the whole scenario so funny dude, it was a war Saturday night, but respect needs to be shown to both men. It was a close fight that Canelo just won.

[robbyheartbaby]

it's a quote from something Andre Ward said. Andre isn't an unbiased observer given his history with Golovkin.

Oh fair enough I didn't realise.

[JWHardin]

Andrade was a nobody during most of that reign

stop talking bollocks

Golovkin has.....
1) no titles
2) no chance of breaking Hopkins record
3) egg on his face
4) lumps on his face

Andrade was the WBO Champ during that time. Canelo jumped at the chance to fight Smith for the WBO title after they stripped Andrade. Tell me he is more well known or brings more to the table than Andrade?

[aboutfkntime]

Andrade was the WBO Champ during that time. Canelo jumped at the chance to fight Smith for the WBO title after they stripped Andrade. Tell me he is more well known or brings more to the table than Andrade?

oh yea, I think it was the fact that he only fights once a year, and only against guys I never heard of

1) Canelo fought Smith because Bullshhtkin shat the bed over weight

he announced Smith AFTER the Golovkin negotiation failed

2) Canelo just fought Golovkin 2x..... and even aside from Golovkin, Canelo has faced better guys than Andrade

find something relevant to whine about

how about the fact that Golovkin has no titles.... no chance of breaking Hopkins record.... does not have a signature win.... and now has lumps all over his face

[Ake-Dawg]

Floyd said hed Ko Pac but didn't fight the way he said he would. Floyd didn't look like he was trying to KO pac. He just fought Pac like he fought everyone. Floyd fans don't show disdain to Floyd for lying. So stop making things up as you go along as to why GGG lost.
Sometimes fighters lie, to make there opponent prepare wrongly. GGG gave you and exciting fight, what more you want?

WTF does Floyd have to do with this? Making things up? What are you on about? GGG was labeled a killer, said he'd KO anyone from 154-168. He said that he fought real Mexican style. He did not cut off the ring like a killer, he did not KO anyone that wasn't a C level fighter, he did not fight Mexican style in the 2nd fight. What got made up? When did I speak on "why" GGG lost. GGG didn't give me an exciting fight. GGG and Alvarez did.