Number of Punches Determines a Winner?

[SplitSecond]

You weigh punches landed vs damage dealt.

[eternalfighter]

GGG loses so now we have to change entire criteria for scoring in boxing to help him and his cry baby fans? Went from killer who Kos everyone from 154-168 to now getting beat up by smaller canelo so let's make a rule that weak jabs count more then power punches LMAO

next rule is GGG is allowed to wear head gear like amatuers because it's not fair canelo allowed to phuk his face up? canelo really stole his fans souls

Exactly, these ggg fanboys are ridiculous!

[eternalfighter]

And all based on opinion.

Look, if you want corruption to continue, fine.

Did you have this "vision" about changing how the sport works when ggg beat Jacobs?

[Boksfan]

I think the biggest problem with the sport is that there is no real objective way to score a fight. It's all subjective and often in the end, like this weekend, divisive.

So why not let the number of punches scored win rounds and ultimately the fight itself?

Obviously extra points should be awarded for knockdowns and punch numbers should be lowered when deductions occur but at least, you could say guy A won because he outlanded guy B.

I think this might be harder to argue with than the old "I believe he won the fight" line.

What do you guys think?

Yay or nay?

That's how it is in amateurs.

[hugh grant]

All things being equal then it's punches landed.
Unless your punches have the other opponent hurt visibly every time you land. Though not necessarily because your punches look harder

[Citizen Koba]

I have good eyes. I know which punches land and which punches don't based on their trajectory and impact. The people that have bad eyes or haven't been watching boxing long get the rounds wrong. I don't. Especially on the replay. When i see the replay, I know 100% which round goes to who because i can zero in or slow down the bad angles.

You keep on writing essays confirming my point when i said my point in one sentence and it still stands.

Ah whatever, man. All you're telling me is that you're sure that your opinion is right. Problem is everyone else thinks that theirs is right too, cos, like, that's what an opinion is. Now - if you can somehow objectively prove to me that yours is better than everyone else's (ie that you are some kind of omniscent superbeing) then I will offer my humble apologies and start praying that you don't smite me with lightening bolts, but until then I'll be sticking with my initial comment that you're either hubristic or delusional (or both).

[DARKSEID]

Ah whatever, man. All you're telling me is that you're sure that your opinion is right. Problem is everyone else thinks that theirs is right too, cos, like, that's what an opinion is. Now - if you can somehow objectively prove to me that yours is better than everyone else's (ie that you are some kind of omniscent superbeing) then I will offer my humble apologies and start praying that you don't smite me with lightening bolts, but until then I'll be sticking with my initial comment that you're either hubristic or delusional (or both).

There's no problem here. The problem is you don't know how to score a fight and you're wasting my time with your idiotic semantics.

[Vasyl’s dad]

Get youger judges would be a good start. Why are they still using the same old geezers time and time again?
Decisions are left in the eyes of people who are in their 70s.

[Citizen Koba]

There's no problem here. The problem is you don't know how to score a fight and you're wasting my time with your idiotic semantics.

Well, we're agreed that we're both wasting our time here at least. As for scoring a fight? I know how to score a fight just as well as you or most of the other posters on here - I'm just mature enough to understand that my opinion isn't the only valid one... anyways. Later, man.

[dukesville]

Not in the pros...