Originally posted by Eff Pandas
View Post
Leonard and Ali were charismatic. That's would be the case in 1950 or 2018. It doesnt matter. Muhammad Ali is quoted just like Ghandi or MLK are. You think Broner and Charlo are that smart and witty?
And they're not as smart and articulate as Sugar Ray Leonard either.
So yeah, Ali and Leonard would have dirt on them. They did in their time too.
Are you forgetting Ali joined a Black separatist group that hated White people and was the most hated man in America?
I'm sorry, there's nothing in 2018 that could get him in that much trouble as he was during the Vietnam era.
And we all knew Sugar Ray had a coke problem back in the '80s. Fine, but he still would be a smart and articulate guy in any era with transcendent boxing skills.
Broner and Davis are not that. If you put Broner, a weight bully who's lost to every decent fighter he fought in the '60s, he wouldn't even be a gatekeeper and Davis might be a gatekeeper if that in most past eras.
And yes, boxing was more mainstream, but that's because of guys personalities as well.
Ali in 2018 would be a combination of LeBron, The Rock, and Kendrick Lamar or something. A controversial, rapping, movie star, activist, and athletic marvel. A star is a star in any era, even without boxing being as big as it was, his personality would carry him. Leonard too.
I agree with you about us not knowing how great the Charlos and Davis will be, but just think about this.
By the time Ali was 25, he had already beaten 1 of the 10 greatest HWs of all-time twice in Liston, and 2 hall of famers in Floyd Patterson & Archie Moore.
They're not producing people like that anymore.
Until we in America start producing special guys on that level again, boxing's not gonna be mainstream.
Comment