Comments Thread For: Hearn: Joshua Would Like Wilder, But No Interest in Time Waster
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Why are you a 54yr old man with pet names for professional boxers?
Wilder vs Joshua was never happening this year, no matter what...get over it. Or keep pretending that it makes a difference that wilder's side allegedly wanted the fight and "accepted" hearn's offer.Comment
-
Why are you a 54yr old man with pet names for professional boxers?
Wilder vs Joshua was never happening this year, no matter what...get over it. Or keep pretending that it makes a difference that wilder's side allegedly wanted the fight and "accepted" hearn's offer.
but..... they DID want the fight, so they DID accept Hearn's offer, and that DOES make a difference..... you spastic
the fight did not happen because Poshua..... ooops, I mean..... Joshua, shat the bedComment
-
It only makes a difference to people like you who enjoy arguing about pointless things. The fight didn't happen, so clearly, "wanting the fight" made no difference at all. What good is "accepting" an offer without signing a contract? Like I said before, they're better off for not signing for April 2019...they'll get more money by negotiating after the fury fight.Comment
-
It only makes a difference to people like you who enjoy arguing about pointless things. The fight didn't happen, so clearly, "wanting the fight" made no difference at all. What good is "accepting" an offer without signing a contract? Like I said before, they're better off for not signing for April 2019...they'll get more money by negotiating after the fury fight.
p1ss off idiot, I am about sick of your bullshht now
why would you ask that question, knowing FULL WELL that the contract did not contain a date, and Hearn refused to include wording that guaranteed Joshua next
what sort of dipshht are you ?
p1ss off clown, you are fooling nobody
who knows why you have decided to be an excuse-making dipshht..... and really, who cares?Comment
-
Don't get upset lol. April 13th 2019 at wembly...that's been the offer since June. Like I said, wilder's side was smart not to sign that contract.p1ss off idiot, I am about sick of your bullshht now
why would you ask that question, knowing FULL WELL that the contract did not contain a date, and Hearn refused to include wording that guaranteed Joshua next
what sort of dipshht are you ?
p1ss off clown, you are fooling nobody
who knows why you have decided to be an excuse-making dipshht..... and really, who cares?Comment
-
fcuk-boy..... anyone would be smart not to sign a contract where the opposing promoter refused to confirm a date, and refused to contractually guarantee the fight next
why do YOU think Hearn refused to guarantee simple terms?
you are an ass-clown
just sayingComment
-
April 13th...wembley stadium. That was always the offer. Wilder was whining about the rematch clause...sucks to be the b-side. We'll see where this goes after the fury fight, if that even happens.Comment
-
For all the back and to, the AJ v Wilder fight is now massive. Fury serves Wilder well (though I wouldn't dismiss Fury winning ugly) and I doubt Breazeale and Ortiz offer the same reward for the risk. So I think Wilder will want to get on with it after Fury and it will be AJ v Wilder in Wembly in April, rematch in LV fairly soon as the IBF mandatory will fall due (though Pulev / H Fury will take a delay for a shot an an undisputed).Comment
Comment