Gennady golovkin getting credit for work he has not done
Collapse
-
They fought for title in the early 90's, which is 1991-1994. You're biased for an agenda but you can't simply rewrite history no matter how badly you try chief. That's all.Comment
-
Lol @ the fact that you really don't even know how ignorant and bias you are. Just stfu talking to me already you fkn twit. You've been so embarrassingly bested a long time ago, I'm even feeling sorry for you. Canelo lost and you d@mn well know it. Go cry about it lil b@tchComment
-
Those are some good drugs you're smoking.I think he IS the lineal champion based on him beating the no. 2 namely Jacobs at a point in time where Canelo had left the division.
Boxingscene's own historian Cliff Rold dropped the ball by failing to acknowledge Golovkin as the lineal champion by arguing that Canelo gave 'lipservice' about his intentions. Cliff forgot that he stripped lineal LHW champion Zsolt Erdei immidiately after he moved up to cruiser. Erdei moved back down later.
So the precedent standard was set by Erdei and therefore Golovkin is the true lineal champion.
Chad Dawson, the then LHW champion, moved down to 168 and LOST to Andre Ward. He then moved back to 175 and lost the lineal LHW title to Adonis Stevenson.
Did Alvarez vacate? If not, your argument has the validity of a burning pile of feces...Comment
-
The obvious has gone completely over your head - which happens quite frequently.
There will be tighter drug screening for this fight - on BOTH sides. That means Bumlovkin won't have the benefit of whatever special power pellets he's normally on for this fight. Probably the reason why he's been acting out of character lately...Comment
-
LMAO. You can't be that ******.
There is NO precedent in boxing history that I'm aware of when a fighter loses his title as a result of moving DOWN in weight. The Alvarez and Erdie situations are not the same. Not even close.
Put down the Crack pipe..Comment
-
You're the only one trying to rewrite history. WBO was not required for undisputed until 2007. That is fact.
You are claiming Douglas, Holyfield, Bowe, Lewis, etc weren't undisputed. That's a lie.
You are claiming Jones, Wright and Spinks weren't undisputed. That's a lie.
You are claiming Judah, Tszyu and Whitaker weren't undisputed. That's a lie.
Clearly you haven't been watching boxing a long time. NYSAC+NBA = undisputed for decades. Those titles became the WBC and WBA, which = undisputed for decades. Then WBC+WBA+IBF until 2007 when the WBO finally gained full recognition.Comment
-
So what you're saying is that you're ****** while admitting that Canelo can't beat a bum lolThe obvious has gone completely over your head - which happens quite frequently.
There will be tighter drug screening for this fight - on BOTH sides. That means Bumlovkin won't have the benefit of whatever special power pellets he's normally on for this fight. Probably the reason why he's been acting out of character lately...

Comment
-
It matters not. It was still a recognized world title. And it was respected for obvious reasons.You're the only one trying to rewrite history. WBO was not required for undisputed until 2007. That is fact.
You are claiming Douglas, Holyfield, Bowe, Lewis, etc weren't undisputed. That's a lie.
You are claiming Jones, Wright and Spinks weren't undisputed. That's a lie.
You are claiming Judah, Tszyu and Whitaker weren't undisputed. That's a lie.
Clearly you haven't been watching boxing a long time. NYSAC+NBA = undisputed for decades. Those titles became the WBC and WBA, which = undisputed for decades. Then WBC+WBA+IBF until 2007 when the WBO finally gained full recognition.
Really. This is the end of discussion. Bye.Comment
Comment