Tweet
I responded to Dr Gerrard's ENTIRE quote that includes "I DO NOT KNOW THE DETAILS about FLOYDS case" along with him reiterating WADA rules on IV usage.
In fact, I would expect the head of WADA's THE****UTIC USE EXEMPTION COMMITTEE to NATURALLY have reasonable su****ion when ANY athlete claims to require ANY banned method or substance.
That's his ****ing JOB.
And the nature of the WADA TUEC process is TO KNOW THE DETAILS before making a decision.
The question is do you think Dr Gerrad is WRONG in his stance on microdosing? Simple yes or no.
Lol. No oopps over here.
I'm not the one who is in conflict with his interview. YOU ARE. You're the one that needs to exclude portions of his comments Lol.
1. I have no problem with Dr Gerrard stating WADA rules or being su****ious - he admitted he doesnt know the details.
2. No problem with his stance on microdosing - it is consistent with what I have been saying for years.
Microdosing to AVOID TARGET TESTING ALLTOGETHER is a problem everyone ackowledges. Especially with low level or low profile athletes. INCLUDING ABP SOFTWARE.
Microdosing at undetectable levels to FOOL the SPECIFIC TARGET TESTING they are subjected to is a different scenario. As Dr Gerrard said it has a "placebo effect".
In my opinion it's classic risk vs reward - would top level athletes risk their career for the little to no effect gained by microdosing at undetectable levels? Very rare.
3. No problem with him saying today's testing can find a cup of sugar in a swimming pool.
Ready to move on? Or do you still think su****ion equals guilt?
In fact, I would expect the head of WADA's THE****UTIC USE EXEMPTION COMMITTEE to NATURALLY have reasonable su****ion when ANY athlete claims to require ANY banned method or substance.
That's his ****ing JOB.
And the nature of the WADA TUEC process is TO KNOW THE DETAILS before making a decision.
2) I answered the question. Athletes are using it. It is illegal. An athlete can take several PEDs. Also the way it was done can be different. Finally, USADA SUSPENDS ATHLETES for just using IV for recovery, vitamin ****tails .....
In other words, your response is A VERY dumb DEFLECTION!
So if you believe WHAT HE SAYS then do you believe him on what he said about Floyd should not have received the IV? Ooops!
So if you believe WHAT HE SAYS then do you believe him on what he said about Floyd should not have received the IV? Ooops!
I'm not the one who is in conflict with his interview. YOU ARE. You're the one that needs to exclude portions of his comments Lol.
1. I have no problem with Dr Gerrard stating WADA rules or being su****ious - he admitted he doesnt know the details.
2. No problem with his stance on microdosing - it is consistent with what I have been saying for years.
Microdosing to AVOID TARGET TESTING ALLTOGETHER is a problem everyone ackowledges. Especially with low level or low profile athletes. INCLUDING ABP SOFTWARE.
Microdosing at undetectable levels to FOOL the SPECIFIC TARGET TESTING they are subjected to is a different scenario. As Dr Gerrard said it has a "placebo effect".
In my opinion it's classic risk vs reward - would top level athletes risk their career for the little to no effect gained by microdosing at undetectable levels? Very rare.
3. No problem with him saying today's testing can find a cup of sugar in a swimming pool.
Ready to move on? Or do you still think su****ion equals guilt?
You're pathetic. 
Comment