Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who is greatest boxer of all time stat wise?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by larryxxx.. View Post
    I am really missing the point as Frazier isnt even close to being in the discussion
    It means stats on face value don't mean anything in terms of defining the fighters quality, Stats are only a list of winnings not a whisper of who they beat and what it took to beat them.

    We perceive quality, while counting quantity.

    Comment


    • #32
      Pacquiao and No one come close.

      Comment


      • #33
        Pacquiao
        The one and only 8 division champion
        the one and only 5 divsiion lineal champion
        Fighter of the decade
        no boxer in the past present and future can achieved.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Vae Victis View Post
          Just for the record, Archie Moore had 219 fights, 186 wins, 132 KOs, 23 losses with 7 by KO, and 10 draws in a 27.5 year career. So let's not forget the Old Mongoose.
          And Willie Pep was 229 wins, 11 losses, and 1 draw. So we can't forget him either.
          Very true and valid points...but stylistically Robinson was in his own class especially for that era.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by jaded View Post
            He had 201 fights...think about that.
            In an era where you would fight the same guy 6 times. 19 losses is still 19 losses. That's not a good stat. We're discussing stats

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Rockin' View Post
              In my opinion Robinson was just fighting for his basic survival. He was not truly prepared for most of his last fights. Just missing the adrenaline of the ring and the few hundred it can put in your pocket can be tempting when your out of cash. In my experience if you are not properly prepared and your lined with a nothin' burger than you just eat the ****. But if you get lined with a guy who can fight, and you arrive ill prepared for war than it could get ugly in a few rounds, once your gas tank is dry. Robinson was a man of class, in and out of the ring. He was just trying to survive financially at the end. Still, you just gotta love Ray Robinson...…..Rockin'
              For sure I agree with you. But this is a discussion about stats. I did not live through his era so I can't really rank him but I respect that most view him as the GOAT

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                We dont agree that often but im 100% with you on this one, if floyd fought 180 odd fights, up to 22 times in one year with the training ideas of that era, the poor diets they thought worked, well im sure floyd wouldnt cope at all
                Floyd ain’t kaka... SRR...

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by BoxingTrav View Post
                  In an era where you would fight the same guy 6 times. 19 losses is still 19 losses. That's not a good stat. We're discussing stats
                  F Ployd... Castillo took his azz... first fight..

                  Ployd is a marketing genius...


                  With no doubt he’s a great fighter, but... SRR would beat his punk azz,... real fast...

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by pasawayako View Post
                    Pacquiao
                    The one and only 8 division champion
                    the one and only 5 divsiion lineal champion
                    Fighter of the decade
                    no boxer in the past present and future can achieved.
                    Look my lil pinky boy toy...

                    SRR. Sugar ray Robinson... v pac.. pac slleeps deep...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Stats wise

                      Chavez sr and Pacquiao have ridiculous accomplishments.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP