EDDIE HEARN ADMITS ANTHONY JOSHUA DID NOT SIGN CONTRACt

[yammy25]

Good lord you are ******.

I can't even be bothered anym....

No.. you seem to be under the impression that wilder and AJ need to sign the same contract.. they absolutely don't.

None of AJ's opponents have signed a contract with his signature on it. Because his signature is on the contract he holds with matchroom.

The opponents signature is on the contract THEY hold with matchroom...because their purse...comes from matchroom.

Do you think there's some sort of bout agreement whereby both fighters sign their names to each others? Because that absolutely isn't the case !!

The contracts are between fighter and event promoter .. nobody else lol.

Go and speak to onepunch.. he's overseen these contracts in THIS sport and industry and he'll say exactly the same

[TheBigLug]

No.. you seem to be under the impression that wilder and AJ need to sign the same contract.. they absolutely don't.

None of AJ's opponents have signed a contract with his signature on it. Because his signature is on the contract he holds with matchroom.

The opponents signature is on the contract THEY hold with matchroom...because their purse...comes from matchroom.

Do you think there's some sort of bout agreement whereby both fighters sign their names to each others? Because that absolutely isn't the case !!

The contracts are between fighter and event promoter .. nobody else lol.

Go and speak to onepunch.. he's overseen these contracts in THIS sport and industry and he'll say exactly the same

Then why was Hearn saying he was going to send a finished signed contract with AJ's signature on it to entice wilder? his words exactly.

obviously he didn't anyway. but why say it it's not necessary for him to sign it?

why are the other team wondering where the signature is that was meant to be on it? - if it wasn't standard practice, they wouldn't be wondering ...

[rickJen]

Yet another ****** thread.
What's the point of signing when the B-side is greedy as f$ck?

[yammy25]

Then why was Hearn saying he was going to send a finished signed contract with AJ's signature on it to entice wilder? his words exactly.

obviously he didn't anyway. but why say it it's not necessary for him to sign it?

why are the other team wondering where the signature is that was meant to be on it? - if it wasn't standard practice, they wouldn't be wondering ...

Again.. you're taking everything literally when in business and legalities ( y'know what you think you were talking about ) AJ's signature on the bout contract to wilder means nothing because Joshua isn't paying and he isn't promoting the event. His contract varies wildly from Wilders... So what sort of contract do you think exists that needs both signaturess and what does it contain? Please tell me this ..

They aren't wondering why his signature isn't on the contract.. because they know AJ doesn't sign one with Wilders signature on it!! And he wouldnt have done if they'd sent the contract back when they were originally provided the UNSIGNED copy.

They're taking words.. and making sensationalist news out of their literal meaning when the business and legalities are far different.

Two contracts.. one for each fighter.. neither contain both signatures. Those are the facts.

By the way.. finkels signed more contracts than I've had hot dinners and I bet none of them have had both fighters actual inked signatures in them.

Maybe a copy of a signature page from that fighters own contract to accompany their own.. But not ever both on one contract.

[Vadrigar.]

Eh Hearn isn’t even speaking in this video

It’s some random wilder fan boy

More fake news from team wilder

[kafkod]

This is another bait and switch move by Hearn, just like when he sent Deontay a contract that didn't have a date on it!

He's trying to trick him into signing a contract to fight Dillian Whyte by pretending its for a fight with AJ!

SMDH, that guy is a fckn snake!

[kafkod]

No he doesn't ...
Matchrooms contract with wilder for that bout would be signed by Eddie Hearn as Hearn would promoting the event and Joshua. Wilder and Joshua at no point would sign the same piece of paper.

The agreement for that fight would feature hearns signature as Joshua's promoter and Wilders.

If Finkel and wilder had an issue ..hearns signature would be just as enforceable as Joshua's.

Pigeons has worked in the industry doing this exact thing and even he will state that hearns signature is just the same as Joshua's on that contract.

That's why I was scratching my head when I read that Hearn had sent Wilder a contract with AJ's signature on it.

Like .. why the heck would AJ sign Wilder's contract?

[Vinnykin]

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/RKe73XLbBCKOI/*****.gif[/IMG]

[Larry the boss]

So what I get from this thread is

1 now Hearn is now Joshua and can sign anything and send it over

2-while Wilder has to accept anything even if no date or venue is included..

3-No matter what comes out Hearn is right

4-Wilder is no draw yet Hearn keeps chasing him trying to promote him


WAKE THE HELL UP AND STOP BEING PROMOTER FANS DAMN!!!!! THEY ARE JUST LIKE LAWYERS...SNAKES WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO MAKE MONEY OFF OF ANYONE ELSE!!!!!!!

[yammy25]

So what I get from this thread is

1 now Hearn is now Joshua and can sign anything and send it over

2-while Wilder has to accept anything even if no date or venue is included..

3-No matter what comes out Hearn is right

4-Wilder is no draw yet Hearn keeps chasing him trying to promote him


WAKE THE HELL UP AND STOP BEING PROMOTER FANS DAMN!!!!! THEY ARE JUST LIKE LAWYERS...SNAKES WHO WILL DO ANYTHING TO MAKE MONEY OFF OF ANYONE ELSE!!!!!!!

Can you tell me in what legal way.. or what obligation necessitates Anthony joshuas signature to be on the agreement that wilder shares with the promoter of the event and provider of his purse guarantee.

Joshua is not a promoter.. he is not paying wilder nor is he overseeing the event. Wilders guaranteed purse would be paid by matchroom and they and only they would be putting it in escrow and providing evidence as such.

Please provide a legal or contractual precedent that means both AJ and wilder sign the same contract... When both would have wildly different agreements with the promoter ( matchroom )

Im really interested to hear exactly why wilder requires AJ's signature on his contract when AJ isn't party to the agreement within which wilder would be required to sign.