Comments Thread For: Wilder Not Concerned About Fury Pulling Out Of Their Fight

[Straightener]

Anthony Joshua has been carefully marketed and his public imaged honed to appeal to the UK masses. Just like a politician or any other public figure, AJ is most likely nothing like his carefully crafted image. He is a man who is simply playing out the role his managers want him to play. No free will for AJ.

Well it’s working and getting other fighters lemon

He’s obviously putting on a act but he’s also fighting guys in the top ten regularly and winning so he’s made his own path without trying to tear down other fighters to get there

The other contenders should watch and learn instead of being salty over another mans success

[skinnystev]

joshua is nothing more than a paper chump . his best win? a 41 year old x champ coming off 2 years of inactivity and a loss like i say poser pretender wannabe paper chump

[famicommander]

joshua is nothing more than a paper chump . his best win? a 41 year old x champ coming off 2 years of inactivity and a loss like i say poser pretender wannabe paper chump

Nobody at heavyweight has many good wins because you can count the number of good, active fighters in the division on one hand.

[N/A]

It’s been the joke belt since vitali gave it up

I’m talking about post Klitschko era

Answer the question. Which of the four heavyweight titles has the most impressive title history. We both know the answer is the WBC, which is why you dont want to answer.

As for the post Klitschko era, Stiverne was #2 in the world and Wilder is #2 in the world.

Charles Martin and Joseph Parker were never that highly regarded.

So even in trying to move the goal posts, your position still fails.

[N/A]

That was a longggggg time ago. When the green belt was legit. All belts are trash now.

You can say theyre all trash, but the entire sport still revolves around them and the promoters, fighters and networks value the green belt the most.

[Removed Now]

You can say theyre all trash, but the entire sport still revolves around them and the promoters, fighters and networks value the green belt the most.

That's not always the case. Canelo and Floyd are good examples of that. If you can sale ppv you don't even need a belt. Canelo dropped his belt and we all know what Rid**** did lol

[True That]

I won't get excited about this fight until I see the both of them at the weigh in the day before the fight. Then I will be rest assured that Wilder and Fury will fight.

[Straightener]

Answer the question. Which of the four heavyweight titles has the most impressive title history. We both know the answer is the WBC, which is why you dont want to answer.

As for the post Klitschko era, Stiverne was #2 in the world and Wilder is #2 in the world.

Charles Martin and Joseph Parker were never that highly regarded.

So even in trying to move the goal posts, your position still fails.

If your taking post 2013 then it’s not the wbc is it ?

[N/A]

That's not always the case. Canelo and Floyd are good examples of that. If you can sale ppv you don't even need a belt. Canelo dropped his belt and we all know what Rid**** did lol

A small handful of fighters reach a level where they dont have to live and die by the belts, but that doesnt change the fact that the entire sport revolves around them.

Canelo, Bowe, Mike Tyson, etc have ditched belts to duck a loss, but still made sure they had other belts to hide behind. Canelo would have never fought Smith if he didnt have a belt. And even still, Smith had the least valuable belt and the PPV was considered a failure.

[N/A]

If your taking post 2013 then it’s not the wbc is it ?

The least regarded heavyweight champions in the last five years have been Martin, Charr, Parker, etc. None of whom held the WBC. So even trying to cherry pick the last five years, instead of doing the fair thing and considering the full history, doesnt help your case.