Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Wilder Not Concerned About Fury Pulling Out Of Their Fight

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by mapleleaf27 View Post
    do you remember the fight Fury had against USS Cunningham?
    I remember the post fight sing song more

    That was entertainment

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by champion4ever View Post
      That is not true. Wilder is more known, revered and feared by Brits than he is by Americans. Most British boxers and boxing experts alike hold Deontay Wilder in such a high regard that many believe Matchroom boxing and Joshua are doing the right thing by avoiding him and rightfully so because he is too much of a risk and danger to him. 40-0-39 KOs speaks for itself.
      You are wrong pal. I was a Wilder fan long before I was a Joshua fan. When all of you Americans were riding with that Seth guy I was rocking with Wilder . When he was rotting away in Alabama I had his back while all of you were focussed on Mayweather. He is a Niger boy so I always follow my own as is Joshua. If Wilder was fighting anyone else I would support him but he is not known here. Don’t get me wrong within the boxing fraternity everyone knows him but he could walk into Heathrow airport and he wouldn’t be noticed. However I would but Whyte in that category also. Chisora will be known because he has been bashed up a lot over the years

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by eco1 View Post
        I agree, the only thing is that that Klitschko would have KO’d Wilder.
        Wilder's chin has held up better than Joshua's as far as getting knocked down or hurt. Both have pretty good chins.

        Wlad sparred extensively with both Wilder and Joshua. Why do you think he chose to fight Joshua instead of Wilder?

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
          A small handful of fighters reach a level where they dont have to live and die by the belts, but that doesnt change the fact that the entire sport revolves around them.

          Canelo, Bowe, Mike Tyson, etc have ditched belts to duck a loss, but still made sure they had other belts to hide behind. Canelo would have never fought Smith if he didnt have a belt. And even still, Smith had the least valuable belt and the PPV was considered a failure.
          Maybe for the casuals. Unless you're trying to be undisputed champion. I personally don't care what belt you carry. These Belts causes more problems than solutions. I wanna see the best fight the best.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Sickmerch1990 View Post
            Wbc belt is the belt what a load of sh it all other belts what aj holds are from the legit champion of past 15 years wlad klitschko the egos of these two is a joke Joshua is the main champion by a country mile wether you like it or not
            Your deluded. Tell us about the belt he bought from Charles Martin. Worst heavy weight of all time.

            Aj does have 1 highly recognized title.... the "biggest duck in history" title.

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Frazier67 View Post
              So no matter how bad the WBC got, it'd always be the best title because it existed earlier? For me 34 years is plenty enough time for a straight comparison with the IBF.
              should compare the entirety to the entirety. charr, chagaev, valuev all drag down the wba's prestige, but ali and frazier help prop it up.

              wbc had some weaker champs during the time holmes embraced the ibf, but that doesnt mean the wbc's pre holmes history is erased. the wbc has the greatest claim to being the top title. yes in part because of age. the wba's two civil wars that created the ibf and wbo weakened the wba. the wbc has remained in tact. hasnt split in three like the wba.

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by JcLazyX210 View Post
                Maybe for the casuals. Unless you're trying to be undisputed champion. I personally don't care what belt you carry. These Belts causes more problems than solutions. I wanna see the best fight the best.
                we have the system the promoters and networks prefer. they created this. you can say only casuals care about belts, but the sport dies without casuals.

                networks want title fights. it's why the wba has three champions. it's why there are four recognized organizations. it's why there are 17 weight classes.

                whoever controls the belts controls the sport. the fighters are largely interchangeable. bob and don figured that out decades ago.

                Comment


                • #98
                  If he does he might as well RETIRE...AGAIN don't run your mouth about Joshua and about how USA is mocking the UK for fighters not fighting and then you do the same if not WORSE but backing out.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                    possibly, but let's not forget that a prime klitchko was ko'd by lesser fighters than wilder. So who knows what it'd be with the old inactive version of klitchko that Joshua fought.
                    Deontay told me he was afraid of Wlad.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by JWHardin View Post
                      Wilder's chin has held up better than Joshua's as far as getting knocked down or hurt. Both have pretty good chins.

                      Wlad sparred extensively with both Wilder and Joshua. Why do you think he chose to fight Joshua instead of Wilder?
                      Because he had already KO’d Wilder twice in sparring and Wilder never wanted the fight. Do some homework.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP