Did You Agree With Lederman's Scorecard For Kovalev vs. Alvarez?

**Mammoth** · 08-05-2018, 04:42 PM

5-1 was ludicrous. I had it 4-2 but thought 3-3 was in range. 5-1 was ******.

**_Maxi** · 08-05-2018, 04:44 PM

I had 4-2.....

**mrpain81** · 08-05-2018, 04:46 PM

Letterman needs to be put to pasture, the guy is great and loves boxing but there needs to be an age limit to these judges.

**DuckAdonis** · 08-05-2018, 04:49 PM

I had it 4-2 Kovalev so 1 round difference isnt much

**SilverMiles** · 08-05-2018, 04:51 PM

Why only point out Lederman when 2 of the official judges had the same score?

I personally had it 4-2 but 5-1 was possible as well. I think 3-3 May be harder to get than 5-1.

**Raggamuffin** · 08-05-2018, 04:56 PM

Originally posted by BoloPuncher1

I thought Harold Lederman's card was way off in this fight. IIRC he had Kovalev up 5-1.
To me, this was a pretty easy fight to judge. I had it 3-3, 1st 3 rounds to Alvarez, next 3 to Kovalev. I mean he was giving Kovalev rounds when he was clearly getting outjabbed, head being snapped back.
Definately Kovalev had the momentum, although he was tiring.
I just feel like a lot of people are saying Kovalev was "in command", and I didn't see that at all. Yes, Kovalev had a big 4th, but Alvarez was able to take the shots, never panicked, and answered back with shots of his own.

Lederman can't score fights anymore lmao.

**FrankieClutch** · 08-05-2018, 04:56 PM

I had it 3-3 but could see 4-2 either way. 5-1 for Kovalev was a bad scorecard

**FrankieClutch** · 08-05-2018, 04:56 PM

Originally posted by Raggamuffin

Lederman can't score fights anymore lmao.

Lederman literally just gives rounds to the guy coming forward

**4truth** · 08-05-2018, 04:57 PM

5-1 or 4-2 if you gave Alvarez the 1st

Did You Agree With Lederman's Scorecard For Kovalev vs. Alvarez?