I had it 4-2. Could of been 3-3 , but I'd say 5-1 was too wide.
Did You Agree With Lederman's Scorecard For Kovalev vs. Alvarez?
Collapse
-
I had it exactly the same as Harold, and I was at the fight. I gave Eleider the second round. I got home at 2:00 Am watched the fight on DVR and scored it the same way. I think The power punches by Kovalev in person was very impressive, and it was clear the Alvarez was in deep trouble in 5-6 , but you could Kovalev getting winded and he was very upright.
I picked draw in the fight but I also stated in a previous post I thought Alvarez would win the fight and get robbed by the judges. Best fight at the Etess arena in Atlantic City since “ Cool Vince Phillips upset Hall of Famer Kostya Tszyu. Clemenza was at that fight as well. And that’s thatComment
-
-
as I said in another thread, 4-2 or 3-3 are the only scores possible. I don't think I've ever in my life agreed with a Harol Ledderman card. This is the same guy that scored the Maurice Harris vs Larry Holmes fight for Holmes in a fight that it was hard to even give Holmes a clear round. He has his agenda. Had Kovalev made it out of the 7th round after, I wouldn't have been shocked had he only scored it only 10-8 for Alvarez. He doesn't even try to hide his biasness and Max seems like he's afraid to go against him. He'll say, "well I have the fight ____" but won't publicly challenge Ledderman's bs. Let's not forget that Ledderman gave Kovalev the 9th round in the first fight against Ward too. I still don't know how he managed to do that as well.Comment
-
I was mostly agreeing with Harold. I thought Kovalev was a lot busier and landing some nice shots with the higher volume. Alvarez would pick his shots and eventually land and it was nice, but Kovalev was busier and landing more I thought. I honestly did not see Alvarez ahead up until the stoppage.Comment
Comment