Originally posted by 4truth
View Post
I think if you watch his fights now and his skills but still are held up on a controversial SD loss against an opponent who fouled relentlessly, cheated the scales etc; then you are in denial. Even the Salido fight you can see how much he improved and grown into the pro game when he had Salido out on his feet hanging on for dear life at the end.
I think Russell may end up being a better fighter than Linares (if he ups his schedule to at least 2 fights a year) and it's clear to see Loma is a much better and more complete fighter NOW than he was when he beat GRJ 11-1. It's like the pro experience actually had an impact unbelievably. The Loma of the Walters fight for example would have gotten GRJ out of there instead of the 11-1 win.
Fighters develop and improve differently. Hopkins lost to a bum age 24 and didn't win a title until he was 30. Marquez and Arguello failed their first title attempts (Arguello by wide decision, Marquez controversial) and Marquez didn't win a title until age 29 and visibly got better from the Medina fight. I don't think we think about this stuff too much when assessing them. Arguello is a top 10 Latino fighter ever, Hopkins and Marquez among the best 5 or 6 best fighters of their era. There's undefeated hall of famers like Calzaghe, Ward who are clearly less accomplished fighters than Marquez, Hopkins and Arguello.
Comment