Who gives a ****, boxing is about who you beat, not who you lose to. These arguments are almost as dumb and pointless as the mythical lb for lb bull**** that exists in some made up fantasy land
What fighters would have beat Salido in their 2nd pro fight?
Collapse
-
were any of these 3 25 years old?Comment
-
-
I think it's overstated to be honest. Hopkins was 24 in his debut and lost to a nobody. Alexis Argeullo, Juan Manuel Marquez also some examples of great fighters who lost their first title shots (I think Marquez like Loma was robbed somewhat).
It's very rare in history regardless of age of anyone going for a title so early into a career. Pro experience is very underrated on this forum. There's a reason why no fighter in history has won titles in as few fights as Loma and guys like Tszyu, Rigo, GGG, Usyk, Nazarov etc; are just some modern examples of elite fighters with extensive amateur backgrounds who fast tracked to titles.
He's clearly learned from it and is a much better fighter (the best in the world) now and anyone that doesn't see that is either biased or isn't watching correctly.Comment
-
You're really delusional and a huge stain on good, intelligent boxing fans. Rainford is an all time great after his victory over the 25 foot bronze Master Splinter so he wouldn't need PEDs to beat some no name picante pants.Comment
-
just let them hate man. all theyve got to cling onto is a controversial loss in a 2nd pro fight to someone who fouled repeatedly. these freaks have to hate to bring meaning to their sad little lives so just leave them to it.Comment
Comment