What fighters would have beat Salido in their 2nd pro fight?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BigZ44
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2015
    • 35532
    • 3,042
    • 1,201
    • 162,112

    #31
    Who gives a ****, boxing is about who you beat, not who you lose to. These arguments are almost as dumb and pointless as the mythical lb for lb bull**** that exists in some made up fantasy land

    Comment

    • Larry the boss
      EDUCATED
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jan 2011
      • 90798
      • 6,419
      • 4,473
      • 2,500,480

      #32
      Originally posted by Real boxer
      In his second fight, Mikey fought a guy who was 0-1.
      Originally posted by Real boxer
      Brelands second fight was against a guy who had 7 fights in 2 years. Not likely he would have beaten Salido but a better chance than the guy mentioned above.
      Originally posted by Real boxer
      Yea, floyd was so elite in his second fight, he fought a guy with a whopping one win in 2 whole fights.
      were any of these 3 25 years old?

      Comment

      • jas
        Voice of Reason
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 22527
        • 936
        • 912
        • 1,059,614

        #33
        Originally posted by Real boxer
        What fighters in history would have beaten a 55 fight veteran, former world champion in their 2nd pro fight?
        Really good question

        Comment

        • Larry the boss
          EDUCATED
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 90798
          • 6,419
          • 4,473
          • 2,500,480

          #34
          He lost, he, learned, moved on and has gotten some great wins...Why the fuss over it?

          Comment

          • Hatesrats
            KXNG of KXNGS
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Nov 2007
            • 4809
            • 215
            • 12
            • 17,529

            #35

            Comment

            • chrisJS
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2007
              • 8989
              • 331
              • 64
              • 78,477

              #36
              Originally posted by larryxxx..
              He lost, he, learned, moved on and has gotten some great wins...Why the fuss over it?
              I think it's overstated to be honest. Hopkins was 24 in his debut and lost to a nobody. Alexis Argeullo, Juan Manuel Marquez also some examples of great fighters who lost their first title shots (I think Marquez like Loma was robbed somewhat).

              It's very rare in history regardless of age of anyone going for a title so early into a career. Pro experience is very underrated on this forum. There's a reason why no fighter in history has won titles in as few fights as Loma and guys like Tszyu, Rigo, GGG, Usyk, Nazarov etc; are just some modern examples of elite fighters with extensive amateur backgrounds who fast tracked to titles.

              He's clearly learned from it and is a much better fighter (the best in the world) now and anyone that doesn't see that is either biased or isn't watching correctly.

              Comment

              • Vegemil
                Errol Spence Nuthugger
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2016
                • 4877
                • 190
                • 113
                • 250,131

                #37
                Originally posted by Mike D
                Sutherland, Ali, and Prime Jesus

                Maybe Rainford on PEDs
                You're really delusional and a huge stain on good, intelligent boxing fans. Rainford is an all time great after his victory over the 25 foot bronze Master Splinter so he wouldn't need PEDs to beat some no name picante pants.

                Comment

                • mcdonalds
                  Undisputed Champion
                  • Oct 2017
                  • 3700
                  • 298
                  • 11
                  • 106,172

                  #38
                  Lmfao wasn't lomachenko already 26 years old and a heavy favorite in that fight???

                  TBE at 26 would never lose to a salido

                  Comment

                  • Mr. 29K
                    Banned
                    • Oct 2014
                    • 3766
                    • 302
                    • 689
                    • 24,424

                    #39
                    Loma****. ... oh wait. Hahhaa

                    Comment

                    • Madison Boxing
                      Banned
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jul 2015
                      • 35364
                      • 6,455
                      • 3,367
                      • 190,590

                      #40
                      just let them hate man. all theyve got to cling onto is a controversial loss in a 2nd pro fight to someone who fouled repeatedly. these freaks have to hate to bring meaning to their sad little lives so just leave them to it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP