Why was Wilder expected to sign for a fight 1 year away with a flat fee??

[koolkc107]

Lolx.... you sound like a baby. AJ is a ppv star at least in Europe to be modest. Parker is also a ppv star in his country no matter how small he is still recognised.
Why has wilder not sold a single ppv in his own country?
If AJ is a local celebrity with over 1mil ppv, it implies that wilder is no where near being a celeb and it proves that hearn is over paying him for the green belt.

And if your wilder had 50mil,hkw come he couldn't pay other champs to unify with them? You can't even pay other champs to unify with you when yourself still earn 1.5mil.

Boxing is not a charity sport fella, open your eyes.

AJ is a PPV star in one country.

Parker can't even sell 100K PPVs in his own country, and the money generated barely covers purses for those events.

But, you AJ fanboys seem to have trouble answering a simple question.

Hearns paid for Martin's belt with a deal that was damn near 50/50.

Hearns paid an old faded Wlad 50/50 for his name.

Hearns paid Parker 7M guaranteet and a 32% split for the first legit win of a belt in the ring.

But, for the green belt, to become an undisputed heavyweight champ, to start a real heavyweight legacy via the most lucrative fight in the sport....

...you offer a flat fee?

If you idiots can't see this inconsistency for what it really is, I feel sorry for you.

[Laligalaliga]

No. Not gladly accepted. Very reluctantly accepted based on a hunch that even if they accepted, Hearn would still find another excuse. They accepted a deal they didn't like because they wanted to prove Hearn didn't want the fight next.




Yes. Nearly every day of my life.

I have a problem with wilder and his camp using April 2019 as an excuse for not signing the contract.
It's not a new practice that fighters agree and sign fights even when a have a fight in between.
So am not buying into that excuse as far as they are okay with other conditions attached to the contract.

[Laligalaliga]

You just proved how much of a pinhead you are.

You are trying to play it like Parker is a PPV star who deserves more than Wilder when in truth you can't even show me where he has generated more money thru PPV than Wilder's usual guaranteed purses.

I'll spare your silly arse the research: you won't find any fight Parker did like that.

I am still waiting for one of you AJ fanboys to explain the difference in treatment by Matchroom.

They needed Martin for a belt, he got 50/50.
They needed Wlad for a name, he got 50/50.
They needed Parker for more legitimacy, he got 32%

Wilder is worth more to AJ's career than ALL OF THEM COMBINED.

Both as far as legacy AND financially.

Yet, they are offering a flat fee?
They are offering 15%? 25%?

I get you wanting to defend your idol...but there is no defending this cowardice.

Hearn is making AJ look like a punk.

you make no sense buddy.

[Laligalaliga]

AJ is a PPV star in one country.

Parker can't even sell 100K PPVs in his own country, and the money generated barely covers purses for those events.

But, you AJ fanboys seem to have trouble answering a simple question.

Hearns paid for Martin's belt with a deal that was damn near 50/50.

Hearns paid an old faded Wlad 50/50 for his name.

Hearns paid Parker 7M guaranteet and a 32% split for the first legit win of a belt in the ring.

But, for the green belt, to become an undisputed heavyweight champ, to start a real heavyweight legacy via the most lucrative fight in the sport....

...you offer a flat fee?

If you idiots can't see this inconsistency for what it really is, I feel sorry for you.

You still make no sense... A champ with zero ppv? Earning 1.4mil on average with no drawing power. Where will the money come from to pay him if he cannot draw shhitt to pay himself? Hearn is over paying him for the belt.

I can assure you that.

[N/A]

so now your comparing wilder to golovkin lol

Canelo vs. GGG II and Joshua vs. Wilder were the two biggest fights that could have been made in world boxing. Hard not to compare the B-sides from the two biggest fights that could have possibly been made in the sport.

Golovkin had a filed purse of 1 million for his last fight. Wilder had a filed purse of over 2 million for his last fight. GGG's last fight was attended by 7,000 people. Wilder's last fight was attended by 14,000 people.

Wilder is 5% of what triple ggg is in terms of status and owning world titles.

Wilder owns one world title, GGG owns two. Congratulations to GGG. It doesn't change the fact that GGG would have been a fool to take 10 million and Wilder would have been a fool to take 12 million.

[N/A]

I have a problem with wilder and his camp using April 2019 as an excuse for not signing the contract.
It's not a new practice that fighters agree and sign fights even when a have a fight in between.
So am not buying into that excuse as far as they are okay with other conditions attached to the contract.

They aren't okay with other conditions attached to the contract. They hated the contract. But they said yes as long as the fight was next because they wanted to prove that Hearn wasn't willing to do the fight next.

[rickJen]

He doesn't have to sign.
No one is pointing a gun on his head.
Question is what are his options?
None.

[Laligalaliga]

They aren't okay with other conditions attached to the contract. They hated the contract. But they said yes as long as the fight was next because they wanted to prove that Hearn wasn't willing to do the fight next.

are they more interested in proving hearn wrong or make the fight happen.
It's baseless trying to prove hearn is wrong or right, just get the contract signed and all these will be over.

[rickJen]

are they more interested in proving hearn wrong or make the fight happen.
It's baseless trying to prove hearn is wrong or right, just get the contract signed and all these will be over.

They think Hearn is an emotional hillbilly who can't think straight doe.
The UK promoter has no time for such crap.

[The plunger man]

Canelo vs. GGG II and Joshua vs. Wilder were the two biggest fights that could have been made in world boxing. Hard not to compare the B-sides from the two biggest fights that could have possibly been made in the sport.

Golovkin had a filed purse of 1 million for his last fight. Wilder had a filed purse of over 2 million for his last fight. GGG's last fight was attended by 7,000 people. Wilder's last fight was attended by 14,000 people.




Wilder owns one world title, GGG owns two. Congratulations to GGG. It doesn't change the fact that GGG would have been a fool to take 10 million and Wilder would have been a fool to take 12 million.

what is wilders attendance when he was facing duhaupas , spilka , washington ? Pleae let us know ? And what would wilders attendance be if boxed overseas ? So put golovkin on show in europe and lets compare numbers dummy...asi i said only a dummy like you will compare wilder in the same bracket as golovkin.
Comparing a home grown fighter to a fighter that comes from kazikstan and boxed most of his pro career in europe.
Wilder will be fighting here in fromt of 90k not because of him but him facing off with the A-side.
Try again dummy lol