Originally posted by juggernaut666
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why did Jennings perform so much better vs Wlad than Pedvetkin?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by The Madison View Postthe point of the thread is they realise unless jennings is considered a decent opponent then there is literally nothing on ortiz resume to suggest he is some great win for wilder.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The Madison View Postthe point of the thread is they realise unless jennings is considered a decent opponent then there is literally nothing on ortiz resume to suggest he is some great win for wilder.
As Ortiz ? I rank him highly H2H so this thread is ****** bc Klitchko would STILL dominate everyone not named Joshua !
Comment
-
Originally posted by The Madison View Posthe still won easy. if we are gonna talk about horrible performances lets talk about ortiz v scott and ortiz v allen
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by The Madison View Postwhy did maidana perform better than canelo and pacquiao against mayweather? styles make fights.
Maidana was a damn good fighter especially once Garcia got his hands on him. Pac had been KO'd 3 years previous, and I'm still not convinced Canelo is at his peak let alone all those years ago.
Originally posted by paulf View PostYeah, it was the ugliest performance of Wladimir's career. The ref let him tie up and lean on Povetkin all night so he did.
Not all guys age gradually either; I'd definitely say the Wlad that fought Jennings was clearly more shot than the one that fought Povetkin.
Originally posted by juggernaut666 View PostBecause Klitchko was instructed by Banks to just box while in the Povetkin fight he had to deal with rushing in clinch tactics Povetkin was doing .
Had Klitchko went with Ali Bashirs game plan he would have knocked Jennings out .
Anything else on this thread is fictional .
Povetkin was and IS the better fighter then Jennings ,so what is the point of the thread ? lol
Why couldn't Pedvetkin out box Klitschko, why couldn't he avoid the knock downs if he's so much better than Jennings?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cutthroat View PostYet people regard Pedvetkin as the much better fighter while Jennings gets laughed off as some sort of bum?
I never really understood it at all. The "he was old" excuse doesn't fly because it was barely 1.5 years apart & he just dominated Pulev (another guy people rank higher than Jennings)
Scorecards for Pedvetkin-Wlad:
119-104
119'104
119-104
Dropped what, 3-4 times?
Cards for Jennings-Wlad
118-109
116-111
116-111
0 knock downs.
Really scratching my head at this one, oh and Pulev being regarded as a better fighter too despite his fight with Wlad ending in 5
Wlad cheated against Povetkin by clinching the life out of him and leaning all his body weight on him when he got close. That was no boxing match.
Whereas with Jennings he kept it completely clean and gave him a boxing lesson.
Lasting longer against a fighter doesn't automatically make you the better fighter. Tony Tucker beat Buster Douglas but lost to Mike Tyson. And we all know what Douglas did to Tyson. Tucker got dominated by Lewis, but McCall knocked Lewis out and was beaten by Tucker. So yeah, what you're doing doesn't make any sense.
Pulev and Povetkin are clearly better fighters than Jennings and would clearly beat him if they were to fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dan_cov View PostStyles make fights.
Jennings actually has a jab and moves his head.
Jennings don't get the credit he deserves because it would mean having to give Ortiz\Wilder props.
At the very best, Jennings is decent and no more. To prove you're a good fighter you have to beat a good fighter. And he clearly hasn't done that.
Comment
Comment