Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why did Jennings perform so much better vs Wlad than Pedvetkin?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
    Because Klitchko was instructed by Banks to just box while in the Povetkin fight he had to deal with rushing in clinch tactics Povetkin was doing .

    Had Klitchko went with Ali Bashirs game plan he would have knocked Jennings out .

    Anything else on this thread is fictional .

    Povetkin was and IS the better fighter then Jennings ,so what is the point of the thread ? lol
    the point of the thread is they realise unless jennings is considered a decent opponent then there is literally nothing on ortiz resume to suggest he is some great win for wilder.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by The Madison View Post
      the point of the thread is they realise unless jennings is considered a decent opponent then there is literally nothing on ortiz resume to suggest he is some great win for wilder.
      But by ya'll slamming Jennings it makes Wlad look bad right since he looked horrible and it was his last win

      Comment


      • #13
        Idk but that fight ****** pretty hard

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by larryxxx.. View Post
          But by ya'll slamming Jennings it makes Wlad look bad right since he looked horrible and it was his last win
          he still won easy. if we are gonna talk about horrible performances lets talk about ortiz v scott and ortiz v allen

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by The Madison View Post
            the point of the thread is they realise unless jennings is considered a decent opponent then there is literally nothing on ortiz resume to suggest he is some great win for wilder.
            Well the TS did a terrible job bc Klitchko looked better against Jennings by putting on a boxing lesson even with a point deduction as opposed to Povetkin who made it into a really rough fight for Klitchko .

            As Ortiz ? I rank him highly H2H so this thread is ****** bc Klitchko would STILL dominate everyone not named Joshua !

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by The Madison View Post
              he still won easy. if we are gonna talk about horrible performances lets talk about ortiz v scott and ortiz v allen
              Yet ya'll still demanded the Ortiz fight and slammed Wilder after Ortiz failed his drug test yet again..He just gave ya'll what you asked for

              Comment


              • #17
                Why did Bryant Jennings perform much worse against Mike Perez than Alexander Povetkin?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by The Madison View Post
                  why did maidana perform better than canelo and pacquiao against mayweather? styles make fights.
                  Styles make fights but Jennings performed better than any Wlad opponent since Wlad fought Peter in I think '05 was it? Better than Haye, Thompson, Pedvetkin, Wach, Ibragimov, Chambers, Mormeck etc.


                  Maidana was a damn good fighter especially once Garcia got his hands on him. Pac had been KO'd 3 years previous, and I'm still not convinced Canelo is at his peak let alone all those years ago.

                  Originally posted by paulf View Post
                  Yeah, it was the ugliest performance of Wladimir's career. The ref let him tie up and lean on Povetkin all night so he did.

                  Not all guys age gradually either; I'd definitely say the Wlad that fought Jennings was clearly more shot than the one that fought Povetkin.
                  Pulev is still regarded higher than Jennings yet that fight only took place 6 months prior to the Jennings bout. Wlad ended that bout in 5 rounds.

                  Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
                  Because Klitchko was instructed by Banks to just box while in the Povetkin fight he had to deal with rushing in clinch tactics Povetkin was doing .

                  Had Klitchko went with Ali Bashirs game plan he would have knocked Jennings out .

                  Anything else on this thread is fictional .

                  Povetkin was and IS the better fighter then Jennings ,so what is the point of the thread ? lol
                  That doesn't really make sense though? If Klitschko was told to box why didn't he thoroughly out box Jennings? The fight was somewhat competitive, the Pedvetkin fight was utter dominance even as foul filled as it was.

                  Why couldn't Pedvetkin out box Klitschko, why couldn't he avoid the knock downs if he's so much better than Jennings?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Cutthroat View Post
                    Yet people regard Pedvetkin as the much better fighter while Jennings gets laughed off as some sort of bum?

                    I never really understood it at all. The "he was old" excuse doesn't fly because it was barely 1.5 years apart & he just dominated Pulev (another guy people rank higher than Jennings)

                    Scorecards for Pedvetkin-Wlad:
                    119-104
                    119'104
                    119-104

                    Dropped what, 3-4 times?


                    Cards for Jennings-Wlad
                    118-109
                    116-111
                    116-111

                    0 knock downs.

                    Really scratching my head at this one, oh and Pulev being regarded as a better fighter too despite his fight with Wlad ending in 5
                    It should be obvious but i'll explain it to you...

                    Wlad cheated against Povetkin by clinching the life out of him and leaning all his body weight on him when he got close. That was no boxing match.

                    Whereas with Jennings he kept it completely clean and gave him a boxing lesson.

                    Lasting longer against a fighter doesn't automatically make you the better fighter. Tony Tucker beat Buster Douglas but lost to Mike Tyson. And we all know what Douglas did to Tyson. Tucker got dominated by Lewis, but McCall knocked Lewis out and was beaten by Tucker. So yeah, what you're doing doesn't make any sense.

                    Pulev and Povetkin are clearly better fighters than Jennings and would clearly beat him if they were to fight.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by dan_cov View Post
                      Styles make fights.
                      Jennings actually has a jab and moves his head.

                      Jennings don't get the credit he deserves because it would mean having to give Ortiz\Wilder props.
                      And why would Jennings get any credit, who has he beat? That bum Spilka? Don't make me laugh.

                      At the very best, Jennings is decent and no more. To prove you're a good fighter you have to beat a good fighter. And he clearly hasn't done that.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP