Comments Thread For: Wilder: I Won't Accept Flat Fee; Now It's 50-50 for Joshua Fight

[Sid-Knee]

Good, you shouldn't. Start at 50-50 end at about 45%. If not, oh well. They are putting too many obstacles in the way, plus Hearn doesnt the fight anyways!!!!

Joshua is putting road blocks in the way?

Joshua isn't the one asking for a rematch clause as a weak B side. Wilder is.

Joshua isn't the one who's asking for money well beyond his worth. Wilder is.

But you say otherwise? Hahaha.

[Sid-Knee]

What boxing arena are Wilder fans in ?

A half empty one.

[Sid-Knee]

I swear uk fans believe any dumb **** Hearn says. Wilder gave in to all demands and they still ducked him. Cause they know what time it is.

This isn't about Hearn you fool. This is Wilder asking for way beyond his worth.

Why do Americans keep being on the wrong end of truth and reality? You people have a collective mental illness. Seriously, you people are just creepy weirdo's.

[Sid-Knee]

This is clearly a manger stating that his fighter is at risk when putting him in the ring with Wilder. He is protecting that cash cow, and his fans are too dumb to see it.

Wait, what? This is Wilder asking for half the money. What the **** has that got to do with Joshua's manager?

Reality is this way.

[Sid-Knee]

Deontay is going to get it to because it's only fitting and fair. He was willing to accept all the terms and conditions of the original fight by taking less money and by fighting in Britain and yet they still refused a fight with him. He conceded and conceded some more and yet there still was no fight.

He was attempting meet all of Team Joshua's demands but yet they still ducked him. I say more power to Wilder. No 50/50 split then no fight because inevitably Anthony is going to be dethroned anyway. Just wait till Tyson Fury gets fit and back in boxing conditioning. He will box circles around AJ.

Only a deranged person would say 50/50 is fair. So stop talking rubbish. If Wilder sticks to this he won't get the fight. But it's clear that is what he wants to happen.

[Sid-Knee]

Dude Wilder tried to unify. Even $50 million didn't work. Joshua and Hearn had road block after another as Wilder pulled their punk card.

There hasn't been any road blocks from Joshua. All he wanted as the A side was to fight at home. Which has been the way all the way back in boxing history.

Joshua never said "Give me 50 mill and i'll fight in the states". He never mentioned the states. When he realised the money was only there for the fight being overseas, he put everyone straight and said the fight happens in the UK. So no road blocks there.


Wilder on the other hand has asked for 50/50 and a rematch clause if he loses even though he's a weak B side. They are road blocks.

[champion4ever]

Only a deranged person would say 50/50 is fair. So stop talking rubbish. If Wilder sticks to this he won't get the fight. But it's clear that is what he wants to happen.

Ok, let me ask you this question. Don't you believe that Team Joshua and Matchroom boxing was wrong for not fighting Deontay Wilder after agreeing to all their terms and demands by taking less money and agreeing to fighting him in his own country of Great Britain?

Just in your personal opinion and not your business one; but do you believe that that was right and morally just and fair how they treated that man? In addition, would you like for that to happen to you? Yes or no?

[Sid-Knee]

Ok, let me ask you this question. Don't you believe that Team Joshua and Matchroom boxing was wrong for not fighting Deontay Wilder after agreeing to all their terms and demands by taking less money and agreeing to fighting him in his own country of Great Britain?

Just in your personal opinion and not your business one; but do you believe that that was right and morally just and fair how they treated that man? In addition, would you like for that to happen to you? Yes or no?

It wasn't Joshua's fault Wilder's side wouldn't sign the contract. They gave them all the time in the world and yet they kept messing about and wasting time. They obviously were trying to force the Povetkin mandatory just so they could come out and claim Joshua was ducking. It's bull****. And you know it.

Wilder is a 2 bit nobody, of course he was treated fair. Why, how many B sides in history can you name getting 15.5 million? That doesn't happen. Wilder gets paid 1.5 million a fight and fails to sell out whenever he fights. You're making out Wilder is some kind of star and on equal footing to Joshua when that couldn't be any further from the truth if you tried.

Wilder is again making demands to make sure this fight doesn't happen. his 50/50 split of the money plus asking for a rematch even if he loses has never been done before in history. So Wilder is being way beyond unreasonable.

[champion4ever]

It wasn't Joshua's fault Wilder's side wouldn't sign the contract. They gave them all the time in the world and yet they kept messing about and wasting time. They obviously were trying to force the Povetkin mandatory just so they could come out and claim Joshua was ducking. It's bull****. And you know it.

Wilder is a 2 bit nobody, of course he was treated fair. Why, how many B sides in history can you name getting 15.5 million? That doesn't happen. Wilder gets paid 1.5 million a fight and fails to sell out whenever he fights. You're making out Wilder is some kind of star and on equal footing to Joshua when that couldn't be any further from the truth if you tried.

Wilder is again making demands to make sure this fight doesn't happen. his 50/50 split of the money plus asking for a rematch even if he loses has never been done before in history. So Wilder is being way beyond unreasonable.

You just don't get it do you? Let's play a hypothetical game. You and I both agree to play a pickup game of basketball. We are both title holders but since I own more titles and leverage than you I'm considered the the A side player and you are the B side player. You have agreed to all of my terms and conditions to the game as I send you the contract to sign. However upon receiving my contract; you discover a number of inconsistencies and errors; Such as: I left blank the venue, date, name of the opponent and a rematch clause in the contract. Now would you be wrong for not signing a contract like that and am I negotiating in good faith for sending you a contract like that or are just exercising Due diligence before signing it? Yes or no?

[Sid-Knee]

You just don't get it do you? Let's play a hypothetical game. You and I both agree to play a pickup game of basketball. We are both title holders but since I own more titles and leverage than you I'm considered the the A side player and you are the B side player. You have agreed to all of my terms and conditions to the game as I send you the contract to sign. However upon receiving my contract; you discover a number of inconsistencies and errors; Such as: I left blank the venue, date, name of the opponent and a rematch clause in the contract. Now would you be wrong for not signing a contract like that and am I negotiating in good faith for sending you a contract like that or are just exercising Due diligence before signing it? Yes or no?

Kovalev/Ward was signed without date or venue. Have you never seen a fight with TBA attached to it? It happens all the time.

Why would there be a rematch clause for Wilder if he loses? How many B sides in history had such a contract?

The opponent was Joshua. Why, who do you think the contract had in mind to fight Wilder? Haha.