Hearn: The offer is still on the table

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • STREET CLEANER
    The Watcher
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2010
    • 19187
    • 4,580
    • 4,208
    • 298,225

    #201
    Originally posted by LacedUp
    Why do you keep going back to the 50million when Wilder accepted another offer?

    Wilder had a contract and for one reason or another it wasn't signed in time. Those are facts. Hearn offered him a 5mil fight against whoever he'd like + the offer is still valid.

    He can still sign.
    You are spinning your wheels in the mud. There is no flipping this. Every time their demands were met the bar raised. A mute point all these negotiations points because they really didn't want the fight.

    Comment

    • EnglishOxide
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2017
      • 2351
      • 175
      • 77
      • 42,307

      #202
      Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
      Finkel says a SIGNED CONTRACT was going to be sent this week. They were willing to cave on the rematch clause and just needed it in the contract that the fight would be next.

      Please show me a quote where Finkel says a signed contract will be sent back this week.

      I'll wait.

      Comment

      • N/A
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2017
        • 9269
        • 214
        • 0
        • 12

        #203
        Originally posted by EnglishOxide
        Please show me a quote where Finkel says a signed contract will be sent back this week.

        I'll wait.
        Well they're not going to send it now that Hearn said the date is April 2019.

        But even Hearn acknowledges Finkel said he'd send the contract this week. Before he could, Hearn said we're taking Povetkin first.

        Comment

        • EnglishOxide
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 2351
          • 175
          • 77
          • 42,307

          #204
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
          Well they're not going to send it now that Hearn said the date is April 2019.

          But even Hearn acknowledges Finkel said he'd send the contract this week. Before he could, Hearn said we're taking Povetkin first.

          No listen. You said Finkel said he would send a signed contract this week. This was before the WBA stepped in presumably.

          Show me the quote. Finkel apparently had everything agreed on the Monday with comments. Why did he want to send the contract back 5 days later, without specifying whether it would be signed?

          Comment

          • N/A
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jul 2017
            • 9269
            • 214
            • 0
            • 12

            #205
            Originally posted by EnglishOxide
            No listen. You said Finkel said he would send a signed contract this week. This was before the WBA stepped in presumably.

            No it was after.

            “Then he gives a lowball offer for a UK fight and we accepted it. We have now told him we’ll have the contract back to him by Friday and it’s now a little coincidental that the WBA say you have to make a decision today."

            Comment

            • EnglishOxide
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Jul 2017
              • 2351
              • 175
              • 77
              • 42,307

              #206
              Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
              No it was after.

              “Then he gives a lowball offer for a UK fight and we accepted it. We have now told him we’ll have the contract back to him by Friday and it’s now a little coincidental that the WBA say you have to make a decision today."
              Where does it say that the contract will be signed, like you said?

              Why does it take from Monday to Friday to send a contract?

              Why did he go public with such information in the first place, giving the WBA the evidence to step in, in the interests of Povetkins people? There was literally no value going public at that point other than to give the WBA an excuse to grant no more extensions

              Comment

              • N/A
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jul 2017
                • 9269
                • 214
                • 0
                • 12

                #207
                Originally posted by EnglishOxide
                No listen. You said Finkel said he would send a signed contract this week. This was before the WBA stepped in presumably.

                Show me the quote. Finkel apparently had everything agreed on the Monday with comments. Why did he want to send the contract back 5 days later, without specifying whether it would be signed?
                on monday is when finkel got answers. then he needs time for the lawyers to approve everything. said contract would be returned friday. obviously signed. not gonna send an unsigned contract. stop falling for hearns ifl nonsense.

                Comment

                • travestyny
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2008
                  • 29107
                  • 4,962
                  • 9,405
                  • 4,074,546

                  #208
                  Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                  on monday is when finkel got answers. then he needs time for the lawyers to approve everything. said contract would be returned friday. obviously signed. not gonna send an unsigned contract. stop falling for hearns ifl nonsense.
                  As usual, you are correct.

                  Addressing ‘comments’ Hearn stated could have made a difference to ongoing talks, Finkel added: “I never said to Eddie Hearn I would be sending back comments, I wrote to him saying I’m sending back the contract. And he knows the contract would have been signed.

                  “That’s why today, and all of a sudden, the WBA have turned around and given 24 hours.”
                  http://***************.net/201806262...y-wilder-fight

                  Comment

                  • LacedUp
                    Still Smokin'
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 29171
                    • 781
                    • 381
                    • 132,163

                    #209
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF
                    Right, but when the 24 hours is up, the purse bid doesn't take place immediately. It has to be scheduled, often weeks in advance. So there was still plenty of time to sign the contract this week and then file for an exemption. I've already explained this to you, you're just choosing to ignore it.
                    You're ignoring that they've had 7 extensions already, and now they've been ordered to make a deal within 24 hours. Why didn't Wilder hurry up and sign his deal then? Why did he stop if the deal could be made?

                    If he was just about to sign the deal, why didn't he?

                    Comment

                    • LacedUp
                      Still Smokin'
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 29171
                      • 781
                      • 381
                      • 132,163

                      #210
                      Originally posted by New England
                      nah bro, they put up multiple millions for a HW title purse bid in 24 horus. might need 25 but that's really pushing things


                      the WBA is getting in teh way of the biggest fight in boxing?! my ass they are lol. if they were ereally that adamant about it you'd tell them to go pound sand and that you'll keep the sanctioning fee when you go make 50-100 million against deontay wilder in las vegas.
                      So cringe to see these boys being "bros"

                      Puke.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP