These are all very good points, I just simply see it the same as the two examples I gave, just on the other foot. That exact phrase has been used numerous times by Floyd, DLH & Canelo.
You don't necessarily have to take out killers for your stock to rise, it would just quicken the rise. If Wilder knocks out bums he'll still keep gaining notoriety with the public.
Joshua & Wilder make the most together, they each make career highs with this fight. The longer each wait to sign (as long as they keep winning) the larger the pot ends up being. I agree, as long as Joshua has other options he may choose not to sweeten the pot, but as the potential pay-day increases it becomes harder to put off & most eventually give %splits whether everyone agrees with the negotiated result.
You don't necessarily have to take out killers for your stock to rise, it would just quicken the rise. If Wilder knocks out bums he'll still keep gaining notoriety with the public.
Joshua & Wilder make the most together, they each make career highs with this fight. The longer each wait to sign (as long as they keep winning) the larger the pot ends up being. I agree, as long as Joshua has other options he may choose not to sweeten the pot, but as the potential pay-day increases it becomes harder to put off & most eventually give %splits whether everyone agrees with the negotiated result.
Comment