Comments Thread For: Wilder Erupts on Joshua: I Smell P*ssy, You Coward Ass B*tch!

[Butch.McRae]

lets see the WBA just enforced the Leo-Mares rematch, GGG-Jacobs, etc

(1) Danny held that interim belt for nearly 3 years prior to the GGG fight. I'd hardly call that enforcing a mandatory. Golovkin had 6 fights in that period.

(2) Mares was WBA interim in 2016. They just fought in 2018. Again not exactly enforcing much there. Santa Cruz had 4 fights between their contests.

All non-casual boxing fans know the WBA is the last organization to enforce anything

[travestyny]

A shot at multiple titles.
Plus $15 mil.
And this clown wants more.
Have never seen anything like it.
Klitschko was 10x more popular.
Yet we never heard one bit of negotiation detail about his fight with AJ.

I'm pretty sure the money part was decided and that wasn't the issue.

[Sid-Knee]

We already know that the contract had no date. It also had nothing that stated it would be next....because Hearn didn't want it next.

How can you sign something without a date?

You don't sign a contract because it has no date? That's Wilder's reasoning for not signing? Are you kidding me? The date and venue would have been given in no more than 2 weeks if Deontay had signed.

What does Deontay lose by signing a contract with no date? We all know Eddie was talking Oct/Nov time. And we all know that the venue pretty much would have been the stadium in Cardiff where he fought Parker. So not signing due to that makes no sense what so ever.

Wilder *****ed out plain and simple. I knew these were going to be the tactics from Wilder's side. Run down the clock so the WBA enforce their mandatory then Wilder comes out trying to be the tough guy by saying Joshua is afraid of him. It's all very predictable. It all went the way I said it would. It was bloody obvious what they were up to.

[travestyny]

You don't sign a contract because it has no date? That's Wilder's reasoning for not signing? Are you kidding me? The date and venue would have been given in no more than 2 weeks if Deontay had signed.

What does Deontay lose by signing a contract with no date? We all know Eddie was talking Oct/Nov time. And we all know that the venue pretty much would have been the stadium in Cardiff where he fought Parker. So not signing due to that makes no sense what so ever.


Wilder *****ed out plain and simple. I knew these were going to be the tactics from Wilder's side. Run down the clock so the WBA enforce their mandatory then Wilder comes out trying to be the tough guy by saying Joshua is afraid of him. It's all very predictable. It all went the way I said it would. It was bloody obvious what they were up to.

What's to stop them for saying they would push the fight until after another AJ fight if there is no date...which is actually what Hearn had mentioned. Having the fight in December or next year.

There also seemed to be something wrong with the rematch clause. Seems they had initially both agreed on the rematch, but in the contract, it was that AJ would get a rematch if he lost, but Wilder wasn't certain to get a rematch if he lost.

That in itself might not be so bad, if that's what was agreed upon. Seems that something changed.

[juggernaut666]

You don't sign a contract because it has no date? That's Wilder's reasoning for not signing? Are you kidding me? The date and venue would have been given in no more than 2 weeks if Deontay had signed.

What does Deontay lose by signing a contract with no date? We all know Eddie was talking Oct/Nov time. And we all know that the venue pretty much would have been the stadium in Cardiff where he fought Parker. So not signing due to that makes no sense what so ever.

Wilder *****ed out plain and simple. I knew these were going to be the tactics from Wilder's side. Run down the clock so the WBA enforce their mandatory then Wilder comes out trying to be the tough guy by saying Joshua is afraid of him. It's all very predictable. It all went the way I said it would. It was bloody obvious what they were up to.

Didnt anyone tell these fools that Klitchko and Joshua signed without a date ? Joshua actually fought Molina after he signed Klitchko .

And it would be Cardiff or Wembley ,theres absolutely zero concern where the fight takes place .

Does Finkel think there is a secret underground stadium hidden with traps or what ?

[Jab jab boom]

Ahh, the timeless art of pretending that you want to make the big fight that the fans want but you really don't, but then spin it to the media so the gullible sheep believe you're the one being avoided. This art was created by mayweather, shamelessly copied by Canelo and now is being done by team Joshua.

[juggernaut666]

What's to stop them for saying they would push the fight until after another AJ fight if there is no date...which is actually what Hearn had mentioned. Having the fight in December or next year.

There also seemed to be something wrong with the rematch clause. Seems they had initially both agreed on the rematch, but in the contract, it was that AJ would get a rematch if he lost, but Wilder wasn't certain to get a rematch if he lost.

That in itself might not be so bad, if that's what was agreed upon. Seems that something changed.

"There also seemed to be something wrong with the rematch clause. Seems they had initially both agreed on the rematch, but in the contract, it was that AJ would get a rematch if he lost, but Wilder wasn't certain to get a rematch if he lost. "


Did the voices tell you this ?

[travestyny]

"There also seemed to be something wrong with the rematch clause. Seems they had initially both agreed on the rematch, but in the contract, it was that AJ would get a rematch if he lost, but Wilder wasn't certain to get a rematch if he lost. "


Did the voices tell you this ?

Deontay Wilder told me that.

[juggernaut666]

Deontay Wilder told me that.

So he doesnt think he can win ?

Gotcha !

[Sid-Knee]

What's to stop them for saying they would push the fight until after another AJ fight if there is no date...which is actually what Hearn had mentioned. Having the fight in December or next year.

There also seemed to be something wrong with the rematch clause. Seems they had initially both agreed on the rematch, but in the contract, it was that AJ would get a rematch if he lost, but Wilder wasn't certain to get a rematch if he lost.

That in itself might not be so bad, if that's what was agreed upon. Seems that something changed.

Hearn wouldn't dare to play around if Wilder signed. It would have shown him to be untrustworthy. The fight would have happened by the end of the year. AJ wouldn't have fought somebody else in-between. So lets not pretend that would be the case.

Deontay shouldn't get a rematch clause if he loses. He's the B side. B side never get to have rematch clauses, only the A side. And where are you hearing this from anyway?

If something changed, Finkle would have gone to the press and said so. The fact he hasn't shows the contract to be legit in my eyes.