Do you agree with this?

[Real King Kong]

pac vs Bradley was a bit wider that the other 2, but all were reasonably close. there were still clear winners imo. just because a fight is "close", doesn't always mean it could go either way. not that I have a huge problem with the odd guy scoring ward vs kovalev 1 for ward or ggg vs canelo for canelo...but in the majority of cases, they got scored the other way and there's a reason for that. and that reason isn't "hbo commentary doe".

[Dean_Razorback]

lol, pac-bradley close? i can accept someone saying kova-ward 1 or canelo-GGG 1 were close. but pac-bradley was a complete and absolute robbery.

none of those fights were close.

you are so predictable

[NC Uppercut]

My favorite bull schit score was the CJ Ross’ notorious 114-114 when Mayweather fought Clenelo!

[Johnnyrider]

Pac man 10-2. Krusher and GGG 7-5

[mxtali]

I thought pac won, last time i scored it 8-4, definitely closer than what HBO had it. Bradley’s defense and weird movement made it look like Pac was beating his ass when he was really slipping LOTS of punches. 11-1 card from Lederman was atrocious as well as commentary.

Never sat down and scored Kov ward 1 but from the looks of the while fight could have gone either way probably lean towards Kov. Commentary and Ledermans card could have been better but it wasn’t their worst night.

Thought Canelo drew, scored 1-3, 10-12 for him. Commentary was okay i guess, they were alright with the draw, didn’t scream robbery like the other fights. Lederman card was bad, i remembered he said “I thought GGG outboxed Canelo in round 1” Wtf? How?

[Motorcity Cobra]

Pac v Bradley 1 was much closer than some people admit or even understand. I did have Pacquiao winning but it was close. Bradley had Pac missing for large parts of the fight, keeping him off balance and picking up plenty of late rounds. I still can't see how Bradley won though, there's no way he won the majority of the rounds.

Same as there's no way Ward won more rounds than Kovalev in the first fight, as well as being dropped.

GGG won too. Let's be fair, if Canelo gets a draw at best on the cards, you know he lost.

All the fights were very competitive though. If one was to go back and watch Pac v Tim objectively, i think they might be surprised that it really was quite a close competitive fight, but the wrong winner.

I agree with your first two points. I had GGG-Canelo a draw or close win either way.

[McNulty]

The greatest tricks HBO ever pulled was convincing majority of the boxing world that Pac vs Bradley 1 , Kovalev vs Ward 1 & GGG vs Canelo 1 were not even close fights at the very least pic.twitter.com/UeDgFkeBhQ

— NBT BOXING (@BoxingNbt) June 15, 2018

The only close one imo was Pac vs Bradley 1. I thought Ward and GGG won comfortably.

[Jsmooth9876]

Another imbecile on Twitter who thinks people don't have their own 2 eyes and believe everything some jerkoff commentator or ringside judge who works for the network tells them.

We have our brains and can decide who we think won the fights just fine.

A woman sitting ringside thought Canelo won 10 rounds against GGG and some morons on here agreed with her.

[bojangles1987]

Pac-Bradley is only close in the sense that it seemed so obvious Pac was winning that he let Bradley make a case in a few rounds, which somehow turned into him winning a fight he had no real case of winning.

The other two are obviously close fights, though.

[Eff Pandas]

Who said that?

And nah HBO's greatest trick was convincing mfers they are still the king of boxing channels.