If he cleans out 147 he will be TBE! Crawford was undisputed at 140.. that made him the only number 2 to ward.. but when ward retired Crawford became number 1. I also moved Lomachenko up to number 2 when he took all my money against rigo and linares.. so I must show respect there.. now with that being said.. I still think both are very accomplished but are in very dangerous waters.. Crawford is in a deep division with some dangerous champs.. Thurman and Spence respectfully.. and Loma has to definitely keep his eye on Mikey!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Ward: What More Does Crawford Have to Do to Be P4P Number 1?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by chrisJS View PostBeltran was a better win than Molina. So was Diaz and so was Indongo because he held the WBA/IBF titles and was unbeaten. Burns was also a better win.
I do agree the top of Loma's resume is better though. Those 4 wins trump Bud's but people have tended to underrate the Postol and Gamboa wins. He was a 2-1 underdog against Gamboa.
Comment
-
Lmao ward is talking out his ass.
Crawford isn’t higher than Canelo or golovkin. Jeff horn was a ****ing bum, a bum. If anybody thinks horn was a good fighter go drink bleach. He was a easy fight for an easy title.
P4p is still open but Lomachenko is #1 for taking out Linares in an exciting match
Golovkin Canelo both #2 and then Crawford #3
Winner of cinnamon and borat #2 is the p4p champion.
Crawford needs to beat Garcia,Porter,Thurman and Spence for that spot but only Spence will probably fight him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by S7V7N View PostTook 11 years to figure this out? hah!
Seriously, how about Crawford beats Spence or even Thurman. He looks great I agree but until he beats either of these there will always be questions about his comp. Same as Golovkin, even though I think he did beat both Jacobs & Canelo pretty clearly. 8-4 or 7-5 if being generous.
1 - Loma
2 - Crawford
3 - Golovkin
Top 2 deserve higher marks simply 'cause they've moved up even though Golovkin has maintained his dominance for longer & never even been wobbled let alone knocked down. You know I could always argue that contenders/champs weren't willing to get in the ring against GGG when was younger, but we still can only grade on what actually has happened, not on the what if's.
Golovkin has dominance, some nice accomplishments (tied most KO's in title bouts, tied most 160 title defenses) and has held multiple portions of the title. His competition had been mostly average (it was the best available) and now he's fought two elite guys and IMO (in any fair opinion) he beat both clearly enough. I feel he's not only less skilled/talented than the top two he's also a little past his best whilst they are entering their primes and I think their achievements are better too despite not being tested against someone as high quality as Canelo.
Comment
-
Crawford was already p4p. Before Horn, before Indongo. Cut the resume b.s. out. Its others peoples p4p list. They can have who they want. Its not a resume list. Aint nobody beating down Bud's door. Aint nobody calling him out for a fight(except Jean, Diaz), or less they want a payday(Benavidez). Its who has the most skill, who looks the best, and who you think would win if these mofos actually fought. Nobody wants to fight this cat
Comment
-
Lol. brotha backing a brotha. What has he done till now? Whom has he defeated. Let him dance with Danny Garcia, or Spence or Thurman, then we would see.
Thurman would give him a boxing lesson
Comment
Comment