Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Frightening Characteristic That Separates Crawford From Everyone

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by 123tommy View Post
    Crawford/Spence is the best fight that can be made in boxing
    It may look good on paper. I'm not confident it'll be so thrilling in the ring.

    Spence is bigger, stronger, has faster hands and the same mean streak they're touting in this article.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Dr.Cool View Post
      Remind me again, who all Bud has "conquered". AB conquered FOUR DIVISIONS!!! You know how he did it? The same way as Bud. Picking up paper titles. Everyone Broner has lost to is better than anyone Bud has ever even thought about fighting. Literally.

      It doesn't mean Bud sucks or that the titles he won as a weight bully matters. It just means, if Bud is as good as his fans and Andrea Hale want everyone to believe he is, then he really needs to stop chasing paper titles and fighting journeymen and gatekeepers.

      Bud is good, but why can't he fight anyone with a chance??? This is looking a lot like g's career. Fight bums until you are 35, then fight one or two good opponents, and ride off into the sunset. He is already 31, so just a few more years of journeymen!

      I prefer fighters like Broner. Guys who take chances. Who take tough fights. AB has half the talent as Bud, but 10 times more balls. Bud is a disgrace to boxing. He isn't ppv. The reason why he isn't, is because no one is going to pay to watch a fight involving Indongo, Postol, or Horn. They tried it with Postol and TR lost loads on that.

      The reason Bud is fighting on a $5 ppv is because of his incredibly weak resume. When he starts fighting the best, then we will see how good he really is. We know he can beat Indongo, Postol, and Horn. But can he beat DSG? Porter? Let alone Thurman or Spence. We don't know, because Bud has been castrated. That is why he has no charisma or personality. He is a eunuch.
      wtf are you smoking Postol wasn't a bum. Crawford was being heavily accused of ducking him for a reason.. then he takes the fight and breezes to a win now Postol sucks lol.

      Horn beat Pacquiao when Pacman was ranked top 10 PFP so how is he a paper champ? this would be another great win for Bud.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Illmatic94 View Post
        wtf are you smoking Postol wasn't a bum. Crawford was being heavily accused of ducking him for a reason.. then he takes the fight and breezes to a win now Postol sucks lol.

        Horn beat Pacquiao when Pacman was ranked top 10 PFP so how is he a paper champ? this would be another great win for Bud.
        lmao! Good one, you actually made me laugh. Thank you for that.

        Seriously though, no one ever accused anyone of ducking Postol. Postol was a complete bum. Pac was 40 years old!!! Jeez, Brian Nielson beat Larry Holmes, I guess that makes him great too.

        Horn is a paper champ. This is his first fight out of Australia or New Zealand. Horn is used to getting cheered on by his students. Horn is the definition of a paper champ.

        Spence, Thurman, DSG, Porter, and Bud in the division. And a gym teacher in the same division. lmao. You made me laugh again! Gracias, I needed a good laugh today.

        Okay, you do have a point though. I mean maybe Horn is the next Grover Wiley!!! Who's Grover Wiley you ask? Not the muppet from Sesame Street, it is one who beat the great Julio Ceasar Chavez Sr.!

        lol, yes wins over Postol and Horn are so impressive. Please, Broner has fought much stiffer competition, despite being significantly smaller and significantly less talented.

        Bud is a eunuch. He was castrated as a young boy. Yea, I guess Postol is a great win for a eunuch. Just not for a world class boxing champion.

        Comment


        • #44
          Always crazy to see some peoples critiques on boxers. It can't even be called trolling because the only people they can fool in to arguing with them are people with equally idiotic opposing views. Why is it even in dispute that Crawford is at least "good" never mind the strong likelihood that he is "great". He may not be "special" as that's rare and we currently have some candidates this generation already but this is the strongest p4p has been in a while, multiple individuals fighting through multiple weights in career prime or unreached yet around the world. Or are we judging people on non existent fantasy fights again.

          Comment


          • #45
            Styles make fights... of the 4 top guys mentioned he will decision Thurman, stop Garcia and Porter lose to Spence...

            Comment


            • #46
              If we saw those fights I would be happy regardless of the outcomes

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by fixpont View Post
                Matters somewhat, but very very very far from p4p top3 position. Beat Spence and Thurman, and we can talk. Similar to Loma, beat Garcia and we can talk.
                Wow on both. Just who exactly is on your top 3 list?
                Last edited by Usetoloveboxing; 06-09-2018, 09:33 PM.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by The Akbar One View Post
                  Crawford gets a lot of praise for beating mediocre opposition. Postol, Diaz, and Indongo are laughable as touted wins.
                  Such comments only show what an unbelievable idiot you are. Both Indongo and Postol were champions and the best at 140 at the time the Crawford beat them. They may not have been superstars but they were definitely boxing talents at the weight class.

                  Why are you so salty against Crawford? He has more than earned the reputation and respect that he has. Morons you like you should be on MMA forums, leave boxing alone.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by fixpont View Post
                    Matters somewhat, but very very very far from p4p top3 position. Beat Spence and Thurman, and we can talk. Similar to Loma, beat Garcia and we can talk.
                    Loma beat Linares, who was 6 years undefeated top dog of 135. Horn got a lucky disputed decision against Pac, but was not top dog of 147. Linares is a better boxer than Horn. Loma’s win over Linares is much better than Crawford’s win over Horn.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by evets View Post
                      Always crazy to see some peoples critiques on boxers. It can't even be called trolling because the only people they can fool in to arguing with them are people with equally idiotic opposing views. Why is it even in dispute that Crawford is at least "good" never mind the strong likelihood that he is "great". He may not be "special" as that's rare and we currently have some candidates this generation already but this is the strongest p4p has been in a while, multiple individuals fighting through multiple weights in career prime or unreached yet around the world. Or are we judging people on non existent fantasy fights again.
                      Sadly, it’s mostly the last part of your statement...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP