Comments Thread For: Frightening Characteristic That Separates Crawford From Everyone
Collapse
-
-
Remind me again, who all Bud has "conquered". AB conquered FOUR DIVISIONS!!! You know how he did it? The same way as Bud. Picking up paper titles. Everyone Broner has lost to is better than anyone Bud has ever even thought about fighting. Literally.
It doesn't mean Bud sucks or that the titles he won as a weight bully matters. It just means, if Bud is as good as his fans and Andrea Hale want everyone to believe he is, then he really needs to stop chasing paper titles and fighting journeymen and gatekeepers.
Bud is good, but why can't he fight anyone with a chance??? This is looking a lot like g's career. Fight bums until you are 35, then fight one or two good opponents, and ride off into the sunset. He is already 31, so just a few more years of journeymen!
I prefer fighters like Broner. Guys who take chances. Who take tough fights. AB has half the talent as Bud, but 10 times more balls. Bud is a disgrace to boxing. He isn't ppv. The reason why he isn't, is because no one is going to pay to watch a fight involving Indongo, Postol, or Horn. They tried it with Postol and TR lost loads on that.
The reason Bud is fighting on a $5 ppv is because of his incredibly weak resume. When he starts fighting the best, then we will see how good he really is. We know he can beat Indongo, Postol, and Horn. But can he beat DSG? Porter? Let alone Thurman or Spence. We don't know, because Bud has been castrated. That is why he has no charisma or personality. He is a eunuch.
Horn beat Pacquiao when Pacman was ranked top 10 PFP so how is he a paper champ? this would be another great win for Bud.Comment
-
wtf are you smoking Postol wasn't a bum. Crawford was being heavily accused of ducking him for a reason.. then he takes the fight and breezes to a win now Postol sucks lol.
Horn beat Pacquiao when Pacman was ranked top 10 PFP so how is he a paper champ? this would be another great win for Bud.
Seriously though, no one ever accused anyone of ducking Postol. Postol was a complete bum. Pac was 40 years old!!! Jeez, Brian Nielson beat Larry Holmes, I guess that makes him great too.
Horn is a paper champ. This is his first fight out of Australia or New Zealand. Horn is used to getting cheered on by his students. Horn is the definition of a paper champ.
Spence, Thurman, DSG, Porter, and Bud in the division. And a gym teacher in the same division. lmao. You made me laugh again! Gracias, I needed a good laugh today.
Okay, you do have a point though. I mean maybe Horn is the next Grover Wiley!!! Who's Grover Wiley you ask? Not the muppet from Sesame Street, it is one who beat the great Julio Ceasar Chavez Sr.!
lol, yes wins over Postol and Horn are so impressive. Please, Broner has fought much stiffer competition, despite being significantly smaller and significantly less talented.
Bud is a eunuch. He was castrated as a young boy. Yea, I guess Postol is a great win for a eunuch. Just not for a world class boxing champion.Comment
-
Always crazy to see some peoples critiques on boxers. It can't even be called trolling because the only people they can fool in to arguing with them are people with equally idiotic opposing views. Why is it even in dispute that Crawford is at least "good" never mind the strong likelihood that he is "great". He may not be "special" as that's rare and we currently have some candidates this generation already but this is the strongest p4p has been in a while, multiple individuals fighting through multiple weights in career prime or unreached yet around the world. Or are we judging people on non existent fantasy fights again.Comment
-
-
Why are you so salty against Crawford? He has more than earned the reputation and respect that he has. Morons you like you should be on MMA forums, leave boxing alone.Comment
-
Loma beat Linares, who was 6 years undefeated top dog of 135. Horn got a lucky disputed decision against Pac, but was not top dog of 147. Linares is a better boxer than Horn. Loma’s win over Linares is much better than Crawford’s win over Horn.Comment
-
Always crazy to see some peoples critiques on boxers. It can't even be called trolling because the only people they can fool in to arguing with them are people with equally idiotic opposing views. Why is it even in dispute that Crawford is at least "good" never mind the strong likelihood that he is "great". He may not be "special" as that's rare and we currently have some candidates this generation already but this is the strongest p4p has been in a while, multiple individuals fighting through multiple weights in career prime or unreached yet around the world. Or are we judging people on non existent fantasy fights again.Comment
Comment