I'm sorry you've had problems with your wife, truly. As for trying to be patronising to me, I might take advise a little more seriously from someone who isn't illiterate and can actually spell. I wouldn't listen to anyone who sounds like they didn't attend many classes at school, not the sharpest tool in the box are you.
Comments Thread For: De La Hoya: Canelo-Jacobs Deal in Play, No 50-50 For Golovkin
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Canelo vs Jacobs will do pretty good numbers because it's probably going to be the best mainstream fight of the year and really one of the only 50-50 fights of the year. There's Gassiev vs Usyk which is no mainstream and not PPV but it is 50-50. The only other good fights I see are Pacquiao vs Matthyse and Garcia vs Porter. I'm sure GGG will fight again but probably against some bum. And I don't think Wilder-Joshua will happen this year which would've been the biggest, richest fight of the year.Comment
-
Comment
-
If you’d bothered to read any of my other posts on this thread you’d see that I’d love this fight to get made.
It’s not denial, I come here for all my boxing news and while I have since read reports elsewhere containing the comments from Hearn there was nothing on boxing scene at the time i posted.
Anyway it’s canelos fault for being such a pampered diva these days that fans are skeptical he would take a fight that may make him look bad.Comment
-
Comment
-
So he was apparently offered 40%. I think that was a bad business decision on his part. I do not think it was because he was ducking or any dumb crap like that. He obviously feels he deserves it. I do not agree and I am a big Golovkin fan.
I think the risk of him or Canelo losing is real. Maybe he thinks the fight can wait but I would rather not risk it.
Hopefully both guys engage in meaningful fights going forward.Comment
-
If Golovkin does not fight Canelo, I'm thinking he fight Derevy and then Murata. After that I don't know. Depends what happens with Canelo. There is BJS (would be good money fight but can they come to an agreement), Jacobs and the Charlo. I'd like to see Charlo but I think he is on the bottom of the totem pole based on $ potential.Comment
-
The reason I don't buy any of this is because Canelo and Golden Boy makes more money with Golovkin at 50/50 than they do against virtually anyone else. Even if they by some miracle can get 800k PPV buys against Jacobs at 70/30, that's 800k*$70 = $56m / 2 =~28m * 70% = 19.6m
Golovkin at 50/50, even if you go conservative and project only 1.2m PPVs, you're looking at 1.2m*$70 = 84m/2 = 42m * 50% = 21m.
still i think they will cancel any negotiations with jacobs if ggg takes a 60-40 split... but no chance at 50-50... canelo looked at cotto as a legend, i dont think he has that much respect for ggg after all the trash talk lately...Comment
Comment