Comments Thread For: Canelo Willing To Fight Saunders in September, Says Gomez

[TheFrog]

"Gary O'Sullivan and even David Lemieux." Ding ding ding! There it is folks! They'll mention Jacobs Charlo and Saunders a bunch then sign to fight Spike or Lemieux. They'll either say that the other guys were 'pricing themselves out' OR that they 'need more time to build up a great fight.'
I could be wrong of course. Canelo is Mexican and he doesn't **** around

[whoseyourdaddy]

and golovkin will be another year older in 2019 when the fight is made for cinco de mayo weekend.

hell, the saunders taht beat lemiuex would give both guys problems. styles make fights. golovkin was having trouble locating canelo freaking alvarez . wtf is he going to do against saunders?

your comparing apples and oranges, BJS may have better footwork but Canelo has the best upper body and head movement of the two, that's why I been saying all this time, what is BJS gonna do when he finds himself missing in close range vs Canelo? All Canelo have to do against him is wait for sounders to come to him. Canelo's faster hands will do the rest, specially knowing the firepower coming in return is less than what he encountered at 154.

[Robi13]

your comparing apples and oranges, BJS may have better footwork but Canelo has the best upper body and head movement of the two, that's why I been saying all this time, what is BJS gonna do when he finds himself missing in close range vs Canelo? All Canelo have to do against him is wait for sounders to come to him. Canelo's faster hands will do the rest, specially knowing the firepower coming in return is less than what he encountered at 154.

Canelo wins on points vs bjs and ggg knocks him the f out

[Mike_R]

BJS could be a trap fight for Canelo. Saunders may have the feet and the reach needed to outbox and avoid Canelo to a decision.

Jacobs is a dangerous fight for Canelo, with the reach and a good fastball right hand.

Lemieux is possibly out of the running since losing to BJS, and O'Sullivan is an easier fight for Canelo anyways. That's more what I expect to see happen here.

Hope the rematch doesn't get spoiled, but it's not looking good the longer they wait.

[Shadoww702]

Charlo has a valid management contract with Haymon. If Golden Boy tried to talk directly with Charlo it would be tortious interference.

They MUST go through Haymon.

Still think its the easiest one to make. Plus I believe ODH was on Charlo's Twitter account...

Why would Haymon not want this fight??

[Shadoww702]

BJS could be a trap fight for Canelo. Saunders may have the feet and the reach needed to outbox and avoid Canelo to a decision.

Jacobs is a dangerous fight for Canelo, with the reach and a good fastball right hand.

Lemieux is possibly out of the running since losing to BJS, and O'Sullivan is an easier fight for Canelo anyways. That's more what I expect to see happen here.

Hope the rematch doesn't get spoiled, but it's not looking good the longer they wait.

I say 90% it gets made. if not then it will most likely be Charlo.

[Shadoww702]

"Gary O'Sullivan and even David Lemieux." Ding ding ding! There it is folks! They'll mention Jacobs Charlo and Saunders a bunch then sign to fight Spike or Lemieux. They'll either say that the other guys were 'pricing themselves out' OR that they 'need more time to build up a great fight.'
I could be wrong of course. Canelo is Mexican and he doesn't **** around

How about Vanes??? U LOVED that one soo much.

[PunchyPotorff]

Yall hear it now..
stealthradon this cuck alrdy saying Ca$h will duck BJS. After he takes the fight and wins...lilgirlradon will say BJS was a bum

Ca$h IS BOXING

English, maybe? Or something even remotely similar to English? SMDH

[PunchyPotorff]

Canelo should do the Spike fight as tuneup, then maybe Jacobs or Saunders. OR GGG could remove his head from his back door and not pass up the biggest payday of his entire career. And Canelo should pay him 40%, Canelo 60%. Probably the biggest risk fight of all the MWs is Saunders. And Canelo should know that.

[Sosay]

Spike or Lemieux it is then.