Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Lomachenko: Getting Dropped Made My Promoter's Job Easier

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
    Lol! Shows you're biased. The Russell, Walters, Rigo and Linares wins all blow away Crawford's very best win.(Postol or shot Gamboa)
    GRJ was a great win! Walters was inactive for how many years? Rigo, a good win, but Rigo fights @ 122, and he's how old? Linares was a great win! Who'd he get the 130 title from? Martinez? Ask Martinez to tell you about Mikey! Ask Salido to tell you about Mikey! Who is Loma about to fight next? Beltran? Ask Beltran about Crawford, way back in 2014! "UNDISPUTED" First fighter to do that since B-Hop in 2004! Loma is great, Mikey is great, Crawford is great, but Mikey and Bud having been putting in work for a minute, and until Loma beats one of them, he'll be under them in my book!

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
      Be fair. It was Loma's 2nd fight and Salido cheated twice. How do you honestly think the matchup would look today?
      I don't know how you guys assess Lomachenko? I can't rank a guy who is 11-1 over guys w/ 30 fights and zero losses. He does look great, but so does Errol Spence Jr., so does GGG, so does Crawford, so does Mikey! Salido does what Salido does, but it didn't stop Mikey from dropping him 4 times just a year earlier than Loma's fight. Carson Wentz is a great looking QB, but he's not on Brady's level. Donovan Mitchell had an outstanding rookie season, but he's not on Jordan's level! Longevity has to mean something!

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post
        Damn you are super opinionated Mr self proclaimed Boxing goat. I am a Loma fan too but Maybe you don’t put much emphasis on becoming a undisputed champion that is nothing to be sniffed at and a 2 weight world champion soon to be 3 weight world champion. It is arguable Loma has a better resume but Crawford has accomplished more especially if he wins his next fight. The word obliterates should be taken back and put up Dan Rafael arse but never disrespect a undisputed champion that has never lost. ✌🏿
        Being the undisputed champ doesn't mean all that much when you win one vacant title and the other 3 from guys like Postol and Indongo.

        Prograis just savagely knocked out Indongo worse than Crawford did. Does that make him better than Crawford now?

        You have to now what you're looking at. There's zero dis*****g that Loma's best 4 wins are all better than Crawford's best win. Only a Loma hater would dispute that.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by markther View Post
          I just gave you the facts but you probably can’t read or write, ******ed troll. Wannabe boxing fan. Your the GOAT of losers-LOL!!! No boxing fan!
          Lol! I can't read or write but you're literally responding to a post from me responding to 'reading' your post! lol! I just think you're a genius now.

          Honestly, how old are you?
          Last edited by Boxing Goat; 05-14-2018, 04:44 PM.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
            GRJ was a great win! Walters was inactive for how many years? Rigo, a good win, but Rigo fights @ 122, and he's how old? Linares was a great win! Who'd he get the 130 title from? Martinez? Ask Martinez to tell you about Mikey! Ask Salido to tell you about Mikey! Who is Loma about to fight next? Beltran? Ask Beltran about Crawford, way back in 2014! "UNDISPUTED" First fighter to do that since B-Hop in 2004! Loma is great, Mikey is great, Crawford is great, but Mikey and Bud having been putting in work for a minute, and until Loma beats one of them, he'll be under them in my book!
            Lol @ dis*****g Loma's wins just because he's moving up in weight. You're a winner lol

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
              I don't know how you guys assess Lomachenko? I can't rank a guy who is 11-1 over guys w/ 30 fights and zero losses. He does look great, but so does Errol Spence Jr., so does GGG, so does Crawford, so does Mikey! Salido does what Salido does, but it didn't stop Mikey from dropping him 4 times just a year earlier than Loma's fight. Carson Wentz is a great looking QB, but he's not on Brady's level. Donovan Mitchell had an outstanding rookie season, but he's not on Jordan's level! Longevity has to mean something!
              It's pretty simple. You have to be smart enough to look at the competition they faced.

              A guy who is 30-0 who beat 2 killers during that whole time can't possible get more credit than a guy who's beaten 7-8 killers in his first 12 fights.

              And while I do agree that longevity means a lot, we really are not making judgment on their entire career rankings at this stage since Loma has a minimum of 20 fights or so left in his career as long as nothing crazy happens.

              Comment


              • #97
                All of these comparisons to Floyd are pointless.

                Let's compare Loma to the current fighters out there.

                That said, Loma vs the Floyd that got dominated by Castillo would have been interesting.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
                  Being the undisputed champ doesn't mean all that much when you win one vacant title and the other 3 from guys like Postol and Indongo.

                  Prograis just savagely knocked out Indongo worse than Crawford did. Does that make him better than Crawford now?

                  You have to now what you're looking at. There's zero dis*****g that Loma's best 4 wins are all better than Crawford's best win. Only a Loma hater would dispute that.
                  No boxing goat that is a poor example of you trying to drill your point home.I didn’t use any such logic because we can use that same silly example and say linares has lost far more conclusive than Saturday . Does that mean blah blah blah. Loma lost to Salido but yet Salido lost to blah blah blah. I now how it works . Loma is good nobody can dispute that but in praising Lomachenko you can not demonise a fellow P4P nominee. I would say winning belts in different weight classes doesn’t hold as much salt as it used to..... just look at Broner as a prime example of that.

                  Loma is a great fighter but he has not had one fight where he wasn’t the huge betting favourite. He was supposed to win including the Salido fight. I am of the opinion he dismantles Mikey Garcia but because someone may disagree with my opinion I’m not going to slag them off or call them a hater. It’s a prediction bro. You can not sit there and tell me you have never been wrong about a fighter? Or maybe you haven’t.
                  Take my comments with a pinch of salt I’m really not interested in the intricacies and breakdowns of a fighter or what they mean to you . I just give my opinion on a fight and keep it moving. If I offend you or anyone else for that matter it’s not my intention
                  Last edited by Noelanthony; 05-14-2018, 02:15 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Bumachenko really thinks he's something special every opponent he's had so far except Salido was a quitter or a bum. Walters for example, he had no interest in fighting..he got his pay check and fkd of..where is he now? He hasn't fought since because he was done with boxing before the fight against bumachenko. Rigo, well that quitter deserves no mention. Let's go over to linares, something ain't right here, he's about to fight what's supposed to be his biggest fight but yet he didn't care not having his trainer in his corner? Is that normal? To me it looks like he never had any interest in fighting/winning...are they getting paid off? Rigo wasn't hurt either and he quit. Something is telling me big money is involved to make Bumachenko into something which he's not. Linares got a soft ass body punch and he acts like he was hurt?! Someone with 12 fights (mostly against quitters) and one loss is already been treated like someone who deserves to be mentioned with other true great fighters. Too many fan boys not enough boxing fans, that's the problem we have today.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Noelanthony View Post
                      No boxing goat that is a poor example of trying to drill or your point . I didn’t use any such logic because we can use that same silly example and say linares has lost far more conclusive than Saturday . Does that mean blah blah blah. Loma lost to Salido but yet Salido lost to blah blah blah. I now how it works . Loma is good nobody can dispute that but in praising Lomachenko you can not demonise a fellow P4P nominee. I would say winning belts in different weight classes doesn’t hold as much salt as it used to..... just look at Broner as a prime example of that.

                      Loma is a great fighter but he has not had one fight where he wasn’t the huge betting favourite. He was supposed to win including the Salido fight. I am of the opinion he dismantles Mikey Garcia but because someone may disagree with my opinion I’m not going to slag them off or call them a hater. It’s a prediction bro. You can not sit there and tell me you have never been wrong about a fighter? Or maybe you haven’t.
                      Take my comments with a pinch of salt I’m really not interested in the intricacies and breakdowns of a fighter or what they mean to you . I just give my opinion on a fight and keep it moving. If I offend you or anyone else for that matter it’s not my intention
                      I don't dispute that Crawford belongs on the P4P list but If were being honest he's nowhere near GGG or Loma. Just hasn't done enough yet.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP