If he has been deemed to have entered into a contract and then reneged on the contract by refusing to fulfil their contractual obligations (principally, fighting at a proposed time and place) then Wilder's side could potentially sue for breach of contract.
The contractual measure of damages is that you have to put the party which has suffered loss as a result of your breach of contract into the position that they would have been in had you performed the contract correctly.
So Wilder could potentially sue for the full amount of money that he would have received had they fought. This could be a huge amount of money.
I'm not saying that a court would necessarily agree with a contract having been legally created - in all probability the contract would be considered "void for uncertainty" which is where the contract hasn't been drafted in sufficient detail for the parties to actually complete their obligations. Having said that, no legal adviser would ever consider allowing the risk of a contract being held to be valid - it just flat out would NEVER happen.
Even aside from this, Hearn would be in a terrible position from a PR point of view as well as legally in a bad place. Again, no lawyer in their right mind would ever allow Hearn to say "I accept the offer".
Concerning that I haven't searched google extensively, including hours' worth of time on youtube trawling through videos, in the hunt for something that I don't know actually exists - I'm sure you'll forgive me if I say I don't really have the time.
The contractual measure of damages is that you have to put the party which has suffered loss as a result of your breach of contract into the position that they would have been in had you performed the contract correctly.
So Wilder could potentially sue for the full amount of money that he would have received had they fought. This could be a huge amount of money.
I'm not saying that a court would necessarily agree with a contract having been legally created - in all probability the contract would be considered "void for uncertainty" which is where the contract hasn't been drafted in sufficient detail for the parties to actually complete their obligations. Having said that, no legal adviser would ever consider allowing the risk of a contract being held to be valid - it just flat out would NEVER happen.
Even aside from this, Hearn would be in a terrible position from a PR point of view as well as legally in a bad place. Again, no lawyer in their right mind would ever allow Hearn to say "I accept the offer".
Concerning that I haven't searched google extensively, including hours' worth of time on youtube trawling through videos, in the hunt for something that I don't know actually exists - I'm sure you'll forgive me if I say I don't really have the time.
Comment