He's proved himself already. He's 36 now, he can fight who he likes.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: What's Left For Gennady Golovkin To Prove?
Collapse
-
-
[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/eAuxTElyf8ys0/*****.gif[/IMG]
This sht has to come straight from The Onion.
1. Trolling
2. *******
3. Shill
4. G stringer
It has to be one of those four to explain this article. Yes I read it. It was painful.
Comment
-
Originally posted by BoZz View Postwe all know bumlovkin is a cherry picking fraud..he can ko bums like wade,monroe jr, geale or the last bum he fought but against jacobs and canelo he looks ordinary...this is why he went back to cherry picking
Comment
-
Originally posted by Illmatic94 View Post[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/eAuxTElyf8ys0/*****.gif[/IMG]
This sht has to come straight from The Onion.
1. Trolling
2. *******
3. Shill
4. G stringer
It has to be one of those four to explain this article. Yes I read it. It was painful.
Comment
-
Well, g could prove he can decisively beat a top opponent. He could prove that he isn't always looking for the easiest fight, no matter what. He has fought two top opponents. The first was a controversial decision win and the second was a draw. Literally. That leaves a lot left to prove. Canelo has wins over Trout, Lara, and Cotto.
I'm sorry, but this is b.s. This is like praising DSG for knocking out Salka. Come on, this is just pathetic. A mandatory against a prospect with 12 pro fights, to fight you on three weeks notice? Nope. Brought a jmw on a losing streak out of retirement instead. Fighters should not get praised for that.
If you give g credit for this win, you need to also praise Mayweather for his performance over Berto and Wilder's performance over Arreola. Those fights proved as much as this debacle.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DramaShow View PostHe's proved himself already. He's 36 now, he can fight who he likes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Real boxer View PostHow many hall of famers signed to fight him? How many pfp champions signed to fight him?
Good job ****ting on Hopkins resume. “Title defenses mean nothing when you fight Allen and Echols 5 times”
Let me guess they were both scared of ggg?
His team is not looking to make good fights unless they make the bulk share of the pot.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DramaShow View PostHe's proved himself already. He's 36 now, he can fight who he likes.
Second, with three different belts, g needs to fight his mandatories. Which g has until August 3rd to fight Derevyanchenko or be stripped of his IBF belt. g doesn't get a pass for being old. If he isn't going to fight the top dogs, then that is fine, as long as he vacates his titles. No "champion" can go around fighting only retired journeymen.
Comment
-
9 defences + 4 years on top is enough for anyone. Should either take afinal legacy fight or retire. Would be nice to get to double figure defenes.Last edited by DreamFighter; 05-07-2018, 03:07 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OCPancho View PostYou're kidding.
You gonna nitpick GGG?
How about we nitpick BHop?
His best wins at 160 were against former welters too.
How about we nitpick Monzon ? Napoles and Griffin ? Former welters . Nino ? Former 154 champion.
Fought mostly in his homeland .
How about Hagler ? Let's nitpick his defenses too.
Fought a bum in Caveman Lee. Hell, HBO REFUSED to air that one. Two fights with Hamsho? Duran , Leonard and Hearns were not career middleweights either .
GGG was on the road most of his life and never lost .
Comment
Comment