Comments Thread For: Whyte Will Fight WBC's Call That Breazeale is Wilder's Mandatory

[juggernaut666]

But Hearn's claim is that he was told it was an eliminator and not a final eliminator. So even if we believe Hearn's side of the story, we know he's blatantly lying in this article when he says Breazeale never won an eliminator.

Hearn is correct .


There was no FINAL elimination here ......you are PURPOSELY trying to mix up meanings , Hearn was reffering to an elimination for Wilder .


The Stiverne vs Breazeale fight was just an elimination fight for Wilder .


You yourself already ADMITTED Breazeales fight was legally bonded to fight Wilder so dont even try it .


Hearns stated what Mr Sulaiman told him , it wasnt a final eliminator bc it wasnt .......


It was an elimination fight period , there was no FINAL eliminator involved .


Why do i know more on this than you ?


I'll tell you why bc your agenda is to affiliate the word LIE with Hearn , the problem is the WBC is affiliated with that.

[N/A]

Hearn is correct .


There was no FINAL elimination here

you need to read the article you're responding to. direct quote from hearn:

""We don't mind fighting Ortiz but it has to be for the mandatory, not to be the 'second mandatory' behind a guy who has never fought an eliminator"

no mention of final. clearly says breazeale never fought an eliminator. blatant lie. classic hearn.

[uppercut510]

Im not defending Hearn you imbecile , im defending Breazeales right to be in a title fight due to legal stuff .


Hearn is wrong in this circumstances but its his job to fight for his fighters , its WBC Presidents fault for lying in the first place !

Wrong is wrong, he lied, we can move past it.... not the first time its happened...name calling, how cute, well now that hearn has upfront said he saw the $50mil and its public knowledge the offer is real, what do you say? should AJ agree to $50mil? will you all admit you were wrong about it being a bluff?

[juggernaut666]

you need to read the article you're responding to. direct quote from hearn:

""We don't mind fighting Ortiz but it has to be for the mandatory, not to be the 'second mandatory' behind a guy who has never fought an eliminator"

no mention of final. clearly says breazeale never fought an eliminator. blatant lie. classic hearn.

Again Hearn can say what he wants , he was lied to by Mr Sulaiman so if thats the angle he goes in on so be it . Hes clearly taking jabs at the WBC and he has that right .


You can ignore the central part of the problem which is the WBC and how its muddled that caused this all you like , your rebuttal is .....


Well Hearn said he didint fight an eliminator ?


So what ,he could say the skies yellow if he were a weather man .......


Mr Sulaiman is the liar in question here bc hes ACTUALLY the WBC President NOT Hearn !

[juggernaut666]

Wrong is wrong, he lied, we can move past it.... not the first time its happened...name calling, how cute, well now that hearn has upfront said he saw the $50mil and its public knowledge the offer is real, what do you say? should AJ agree to $50mil? will you all admit you were wrong about it being a bluff?

WTF are you talking about ?


It doesnt matter if the money is real , he cannot agree to a offer with no stipulations involved no REAL promoter will do that with 50 Million thrown at them....


Jesus Christ week after week and you still dont understand simple logic stuff like this .

[P4Pdunny]

We be crook making it do what it do baby

[Laligalaliga]

Maybe he fancies his chances more against Wilder and it would lead to a bigger payday against Joshua?

There's definite corruption going on here. There's no reason to have Breazeale as mandatory over Whyte.

I would have love to see whyte/breazeale as final eliminator for a mando. That would make more sense.

[Laligalaliga]

First off, I don’t agree with Brezeale being mandatory whatsoever, but two wrongs do not make a right. In an ideal world Brezeale should fight Whyte and the winner is mandatory.

Whyte is not being taken advantage of nor avoided, wtf are you talking about? He didn’t EARN anything. Beating an inactive, out of shape Lucas Browne is NOT deserving of a mandatory title shot. Nor is beating Molina either but as I said two wrongs don’t make a right.

Beating Ortiz does guarantee him a shot, it’s a final eliminator, therefore following Wilder-Brezeale, Whyte would be the mandatory. He’s just looking for excuses not to fight Ortiz cause he knows and we know Ortiz squashes this Whyte hype.

Whyte always ****s on about wanting to fight the best to PROVE he’s a top HW, well he has a perfect opportunity to PROVE it against a legit top 5 HW in Ortiz. Let’s see if he’s a man of his word or just another matchroom b*tch running his mouth.

Am sure you are not current. Whyte has no problem fighting Ortiz as he claims but on a condition that breazeale/wilder will be pronounced as voluntary.
So winner of whyte/ortiz will be the voluntary, that's where the issue lie's at the moment based on recent happenings.

[N/A]

Again Hearn can say what he wants , he was lied to by Mr Sulaiman so if thats the angle he goes in on so be it

so you have no problem with hearn definitely lying, but you have a problem with sulaiman possibly lying.

and of course, there is no evidence sulaiman lied other than the confirmed liar hearn saying so.

[AdonisCreed]

I wanna see how Whyte does against Ortiz. I'm just curious to see how that goes down!!! I'll watch that fight 💯