Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Do people realize Hopkins went from age 28-40 undefeated?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by DreamFighter View Post
    ah i see, you are discounting entirely Titos welterweight and light middleweight career. really, yuo think that carries no weight? haha. shyt argument.

    BUT LETS ENTERTAIN YOUR CRAP ARGUMENT FOR A MOMENT...
    In your eyes, Tito only 6 fights on his resume becos thats all he did at MW.

    ok, lets look at your argument kell brook - hes got 1 middleweight title fight, a mid round emphatic loss.

    Nice one, your own argument destroyed you.

    Next time, dont bat yourself out with your own argument.
    Who else did Hopkins fight at MW, that was good at MW?

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by stealthradon View Post
      Who else did Hopkins fight at MW, that was good at MW?
      "as good as"?very few, perhapp robert allen and some other failed contenders who never won a title just like the level jacbos has managed.

      Thats cos most of his opposition were better than failed contender level jacobs.

      you should already know the names of echols joppy tito holmes johnson, aquino, brown, DLH , Taylor.

      I offered 10 names originally, now you have them, that are better than failed contender level jacobs.
      Last edited by DreamFighter; 05-03-2018, 06:49 AM.

      Comment


      • #43
        It's funny but I think Hopkins would beat Golovkin in a shocking fashion. I'm not sure this record would even be an issue if Golovkin was fighting Canelo like originally planned. There's a good chance Canelo would've beat him in the rematch. It's almost a guarantee he'll beat Vanes so all of a sudden all of his fans and his media cheerleaders wanna bring up this record up.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by DreamFighter View Post
          "as good as"?very few, perhapp robert allen and some other failed contenders who never won a title just like the level jacbos has managed.

          Thats cos most of his opposition were better than failed contender level jacobs.

          you should already know the names of echols joppy tito holmes johnson, aquino, brown, DLH , Taylor.

          I offered 10 names originally, now you have them, that are better than failed contender level jacobs.
          Echols who ended up having a 32-22 record?

          Joppy was annihilated by Bute and Taylor.
          His biggest win was against a late, late replacement in Jonathan Reid. 35-19

          Tito has already been discussed to death

          Holmes was at best C- level fighter.
          Narrow win against Kuvonchbek Toygonbayev
          McCracken, his best win, had been inactive for almost a year, and he was nothing special.

          Glen Johnson had no good wins at MW.

          Aquino. Yep, coming off an MD to Eduardo Gutierrez sure is a good look. Losing to Young **** Tiger afterwards.

          Simon Brown? Are you serious now?
          So how good is Mads Larsen?

          DLH Not exactly a MW, was he?

          Taylor?
          He lost to Taylor. Twice.

          Admit it, these are all just horrible.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by stealthradon View Post
            Echols who ended up having a 32-22 record?
            oh i see. So if itake a gun and shoot GGG or any boxer in their bicep then do you think he wont start losing fights? Dont be a grade A idiot all the time.




            Joppy was annihilated by Bute and Taylor.
            taylor soundly beat him, sure, whats the shame in that? taylor was elite.

            Bute fought the retirement Joppy, dont lie.

            You lie way too much.
            Of course I am serious about multiweight titlist Simon Brown, are you about failed contender Danny Jacobs?
            Yeh you just dont know how wrong you sound.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by DreamFighter View Post
              oh i see. So if itake a gun and shoot GGG or any boxer in their bicep then do you think he wont start losing fights? Dont be a grade A idiot all the time.
              What the fúck are you on about? Echols didn't lose an arm.

              Comment


              • #47
                Hopkins is a bum, he lost 8 fights journeyman at best

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by stealthradon View Post
                  What the fúck are you on about? Echols didn't lose an arm.
                  what the f you talking about not knwing that his arm was ruined by gunshot. stop being ignorant and get with it! today preferably.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Not a fan of B-Hop, but he deserves all the praise he gets. True legend.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      GGG has proven himself elite over the last 18 months or so.

                      But Bernard Hopkins is a level above, there is no doubt about it. He had a solid but unspectacular resume, obliterated Glenn Johnson, Tito, and Oscar. There are some solid guys in there too. Even the loss to a young, lightening Roy Jones was very competitive, 8-4 7-5 type decision. Extremely high speed, skilled chess.

                      I can't see a guy like Canelo giving Hopkins too many problems, he has too much size and skill.

                      I think Hopkins could have beat GGG a number of ways, outboxed him, and if he got aggressive, he would have ate him up.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP