Comments Thread For: Golovkin Promoter Noncommittal Regarding IBF Mandatory

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tokon
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2009
    • 7648
    • 1,828
    • 1,300
    • 42,234

    #41
    Originally posted by GFunk23
    If Lil g truly cared about unifying all the belts and legacy etc, he should have just fought his mando on May 5th instead of this cherry fight with Vanes.
    Truth.

    Pro boxing is business first but, if golovkin wanted to still fight on may 5 AND keep those titles AND be free to fight canelo in September, he should have fought his mandatory - especially as the guy was willing to take that fight at short notice!

    I think golovkin has definitely lost some credibility here.

    Comment

    • filup79
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Aug 2013
      • 2603
      • 208
      • 2
      • 32,882

      #42
      Originally posted by Shadoww702
      Yeah I think both Charlo and Jacob's pass on IBF hoping chance fight Canelo....
      Jacobs didn't wanna fight for the IBF title against GGG and I doubt he will want to fight for it now knowing he'd have to meet the second day weigh in requirements.

      Comment

      • Usetoloveboxing
        Contender
        Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
        • Apr 2018
        • 255
        • 8
        • 0
        • 6,786

        #43
        Originally posted by Alabama Man
        How about this, get rid of all those organizations like WBC, WBO, WPG, WW2, W2C, WRX, IBO, BFI, BBB, IBF and their funny belts. Keep one per weight divisions, which they should tone down too..... and get Sulaiman a nice job at mcdonalds. Getting tired of all those belts, weights and b*ll**** that comes with them. Sigh.
        I agree with you 100%, should be 1 title, 1 organization, and 0 promoters. They have ruined the sport!

        Comment

        • Robbie Barrett
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 40891
          • 2,779
          • 667
          • 570,921

          #44
          Originally posted by filup79
          Jacobs didn't wanna fight for the IBF title against GGG and I doubt he will want to fight for it now knowing he'd have to meet the second day weigh in requirements.
          They dropped it for unified fights didn't they, which is why they didn't do it in the Canelo fight?

          Comment

          • filup79
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Aug 2013
            • 2603
            • 208
            • 2
            • 32,882

            #45
            Originally posted by TonyGe
            Canelo is not going to generate that kind of money against any other opponent. Saying he generated 90% of the total purse isn't realistic.
            GGG fights this weekend and there's still a bunch of tickets left. Add to that he's making around 1 million for this fight. If the roles were reversed, Canelo would have sold out the StubHub by now and would be getting way more than 1 million for a fight. Canelo could fight anyone else and still make over 10 million while GGG would only make around 2 million to fight anyone else.

            Comment

            • Robi13
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2015
              • 8230
              • 804
              • 91
              • 348,081

              #46
              Originally posted by TonyGe
              Canelo is not going to generate that kind of money against any other opponent. Saying he generated 90% of the total purse isn't realistic.
              You may be corect, however, we know ggg can’t sell beer at a bar... we also know canelo definitely generated more than 55 percent of total sales. My point still stands. Canelo vacated and it was the right move to do.

              Comment

              • Street15
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jun 2017
                • 594
                • 21
                • 3
                • 10,392

                #47
                Originally posted by Robi13
                MY point stands! When you get to this level that canelo, ggg, Joshua, and all the big money making boxing athletes of today; money trumps any belt any day. With that being said, how could you defend a belt for possibly having to split the money 55 percent to 45 percent when clearly you will be the one generating 90+ percent of the whole pie? Anyone with common math knowledge and common sense would vacate and negotiate under zero circumstances like nelo did. You are sitting here and using the same bs excuse That Gennady has sold his fans... “legacy”. Legacy will always come after money. If it’s about legacy, why didn’t ggg fight sd? Or anyone else to amplify his legacy? Exactly! He is wanting to cash out with nelo. I don’t blame him in fact i agree with him. Just like i agreed with canelo when he vacated. Rules or no rules, only rule i See is the more money rule.
                Huh? I listed no excuses. We are in agreement. LOL

                And when did I mention the word "legacy"? You just used it, and claimed that I did. Smh.

                The difference is, Canelo agreed to it. He still would have made the most money he's ever made in a fight if he fought GGG right after Cotto. Just not as much as he did last year.

                Comment

                • Usetoloveboxing
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Apr 2018
                  • 255
                  • 8
                  • 0
                  • 6,786

                  #48
                  Originally posted by tokon
                  Truth.

                  Pro boxing is business first but, if golovkin wanted to still fight on may 5 AND keep those titles AND be free to fight canelo in September, he should have fought his mandatory - especially as the guy was willing to take that fight at short notice!

                  I think golovkin has definitely lost some credibility here.
                  My thoughts exactly. Derevechenko would have taken it on short notice, mandatory defense could have been handled. Vanes may be more dangerous, hope this little move doesn't backfire

                  Comment

                  • filup79
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2013
                    • 2603
                    • 208
                    • 2
                    • 32,882

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                    They dropped it for unified fights didn't they, which is why they didn't do it in the Canelo fight?
                    Not sure because they had that rule for the Hurd/Lara unification fight. Wouldn't surprise me if they just changed that rule just for Canelo that fight.

                    Comment

                    • Bronx2245
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2013
                      • 28475
                      • 5,415
                      • 1,410
                      • 162,064

                      #50
                      Only 2 days left! Decisions, decisions! Big money with Canelo in September, or defend the IBF title before August 3rd!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP