Wright: "They Want a Rematch, Pay Me For It"

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Easy-E
    Gotta want it
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 22686
    • 865
    • 1,739
    • 32,777

    #21
    Originally posted by K-DOGG
    Forgive me for copying my post from another thread; but I feel real strongly about this:

    Winky Wright won that fight, end of story.

    I had it 117-112 or in rounds, 8-3-1; yes, one or two rounds early on could have gone either way, but not enough to make a difference. Taylor was very active in the beginning, as he was with Hopkins; but landed only about 1 in 7 punches, due to Winky's high guard and excellent defence. Boxing is supposed to be scored on "effective" aggressiveness...not just aggressiveness. If you throw a lot of punches, that's great; but if you don't land any, it's as effective as pushing agaainst a wall: you expend a lot of energy; but get no work done.

    True, Jermain was strong enough that on several occasions Winky's whole body would move from the foce of the blow that landed on his glove; but, in the end, Jermain didn't do enough to win or even earn a draw, IMO.

    Winky began pressureing Taylor into corners as early as round 2, where Jermain was looking to counter or time him with a right hand coming in; but while Jermain was looking for the opening, Winky was tattooing his left eye with that right jab and was landing it as evidenced by the fact that Taylor's left eye was swollen completely shut by the end of the match....and don't give me that head-butt B.S. In addition, in the 8th...I believe it was the 8th...Winky had Taylor in serious trouble and if he had applied more pressure, could have dropped and potentially stopped Taylor.

    Winky completely dominated the fight with the exception of a couple of rounds here and there...particularly the first four, where it was nip and tuck. However, even in those first four, Winky was blocking most of Taylor's shots where Jermain seemed to be under the impression that if he blocked a shot, he would hurt Winky's feelings.

    You can't win a fight laying in the corners and taking a beating for 2/3's of the round and rallying occassionally to the cheers of your hometown fans....that's not boxing.

    Winky landed 226 punches to 163 for Taylor/ 103 jabs to Taylor's 41, dictated the pace, and showed more effective aggression and ring generalship. Taylor fought not to lose while Winky fought to win.

    Wright got screwed.....




    If Wright had won the fight (officially), there was a rematch clause in the contract. In the post fight press conference (I was there) it was obvious that Jermain did not really feel he won the fight; he was very apologetic and did not have the body language of a man who had just successfully defended his belt as much as a man who received an early Christmas present and was humbled by it. Jermain's a good kid and a gutsy fighter; but the expressions of his manager and Steward of not wanting to "deal with this fellow"...aka Winky...any more, told me that they don't believe they could ever convincingly defeat Wright.

    Given the controversy of the decision, Winky Wright deserves a rematch. Jermain didn't "cry" about wanting a rematch because he knows how lucky he was to get a draw.

    On a side note, I don't blame Winky for leaving the ring and not going to the post fight presser. This decision was as bad as Chavez-Whitaker and Lewis-Holyfield I. If I got ****d on National television, I'd want to get the hell out of Dodge as well.

    Winky got screwed.
    No Way Taylor only won 3 rounds.
    Terrible scoring from you, K-Dogg, and your usually on point.
    Strange...

    Comment

    • Easy-E
      Gotta want it
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jul 2005
      • 22686
      • 865
      • 1,739
      • 32,777

      #22
      Winky is really acting like a *****.
      Pay for for the rematch.
      Taylor is the champ, Winky is not.
      Taylor is offering to give Winky another title shot and Winky is basiclly pussing out.
      Dissapointing.

      Comment

      • Mishra100
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 1330
        • 142
        • 63
        • 7,690

        #23
        Originally posted by jason100x
        After hearing all these differing opinions on who won the fight and by what margin, now I really can't wait to see the fight tonight!
        Please watch it without sound because the HBO commentators overrate lots of punches that hit Wright's gloves.

        Comment

        • RAESAAD
          THE MUTHA****IN TRUTH
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2005
          • 24331
          • 2,370
          • 1,730
          • 40,454

          #24
          Originally posted by Mishra100
          Please watch it without sound because the HBO commentators overrate lots of punches that hit Wright's gloves.
          this is true........I say make title fights 13 rounds and draws won't come into play as often.

          Comment

          • jason100x
            SLAY HER
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2006
            • 1102
            • 65
            • 120
            • 7,848

            #25
            Originally posted by Mishra100
            Please watch it without sound because the HBO commentators overrate lots of punches that hit Wright's gloves.
            Actually that's a good idea, I've heard how biased the HBO team was toward Taylor.

            Comment

            • K-DOGG
              Mitakuye Oyasin
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Mar 2006
              • 5851
              • 406
              • 396
              • 25,885

              #26
              Originally posted by PBF34
              No Way Taylor only won 3 rounds.
              Terrible scoring from you, K-Dogg, and your usually on point.
              Strange...
              Well, like I said, there were a few rounds I'll say could have gone either way; but to me, it was all about connecting vs not...and Wright scored more to me. 'Course, in all honesty, I was on the second level in the Forum; and I refuse to watch the jumbo tron when at a live fight. Still, my eyesight is pretty good. I can see maybe Jermain winning 5 rounds; but in those close rounds, I went with the guy who looked to be landing more and scoring vs the guy who was throwing much and not landing as much.

              Comment

              • RAESAAD
                THE MUTHA****IN TRUTH
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 24331
                • 2,370
                • 1,730
                • 40,454

                #27
                "They don't deserve it. I got cheated. I'm tired of being the one who always is giving in. If they want a rematch, they're going to have to pay me for it. Right now, I'm declining. I beat their boy point blank."


                Say what you want about Winky but right there is the truth.^^^

                Comment

                • kallsop
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 351
                  • 29
                  • 0
                  • 6,621

                  #28
                  Originally posted by R.Winky Wright
                  I agree i was confused by his reaction to not wanting the fight... but i mean when you go this long with little to no respect and get cheated by a close decison.

                  I assume you mean the decision was close but you thought the fight wasn't? A close decision, in a close fight, is the right decision.

                  The decision could easily have gone narrowly to Winky and I wouldn't have complained. But it didn't and the fight was close. A draw didn't surprise me, nor would have a close win by Taylor.

                  Winky's style is always going to be tough to assess by the judges. At home, we get a high camera angle and replays. The judges get one low down view, and half the time will be watching Winkys back. They can't know for sure if the punch thrown by Taylor is blocked, partially blocked, or landing clean through the guard - as many did. Watching Winkys face get worse over time, it's clear that plenty were scoring. The real judges are getting a different view than we on TV do and base their scoring on that.

                  Does Harold Lederman sit at ringside with a view comparable to the real judges? His scoring was right on the money.

                  Occasionally a fighter with huge charisma will get the benefit of all doubt (e.g. Sugar Ray Leonard) but a light fisted dullard like Winky needs to have more of the Hagler attitude that the judges are there to find a way to give the fight to the other guy.

                  Comment

                  • RAESAAD
                    THE MUTHA****IN TRUTH
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 24331
                    • 2,370
                    • 1,730
                    • 40,454

                    #29
                    Originally posted by kallsop
                    I assume you mean the decision was close but you thought the fight wasn't? A close decision, in a close fight, is the right decision.

                    The decision could easily have gone narrowly to Winky and I wouldn't have complained. But it didn't and the fight was close. A draw didn't surprise me, nor would have a close win by Taylor.

                    Winky's style is always going to be tough to assess by the judges. At home, we get a high camera angle and replays. The judges get one low down view, and half the time will be watching Winkys back. They can't know for sure if the punch thrown by Taylor is blocked, partially blocked, or landing clean through the guard - as many did. Watching Winkys face get worse over time, it's clear that plenty were scoring. The real judges are getting a different view than we on TV do and base their scoring on that.

                    Does Harold Lederman sit at ringside with a view comparable to the real judges? His scoring was right on the money.

                    Occasionally a fighter with huge charisma will get the benefit of all doubt (e.g. Sugar Ray Leonard) but a light fisted dullard like Winky needs to have more of the Hagler attitude that the judges are there to find a way to give the fight to the other guy.
                    There is absolutely ZERO justification to say Taylor won that fight..........No way in ****ing hell.A draw sucks but it is life Winky winning is what really happened.

                    Comment

                    • K-DOGG
                      Mitakuye Oyasin
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Mar 2006
                      • 5851
                      • 406
                      • 396
                      • 25,885

                      #30
                      Originally posted by PBF34
                      No Way Taylor only won 3 rounds.
                      Terrible scoring from you, K-Dogg, and your usually on point.
                      Strange...
                      Sometimes, if you watch a fight on TV, you can be subconsciously effected by the announcers and you see what they say.

                      Watch it again, bud...and turn the volume down. Watch what punches land, which ones don't, who controls the pace, who's effectively aggressive...and remember, defense counts for something as well.

                      Watch it and score it again...without Lampley and Merchant. I love both of 'em; but they do work for HBO, which is really putting a lot of stock in Taylor.

                      It's hard to be an objective journalist when you're reminded who butters your bread.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP