Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: GGG: Look at Hopkins; My Record's Much Bigger, Stronger at 160!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • oscar and trinidad were at their best at 147, anything beyond that they were fat and slower

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Chuckguy View Post
      He wanted the supposed lineal mw champ at the limit but the coward stayed in his fictitious weight class needing two years to adjust to 160
      You are a ****en hater and an idiot you are blinded by blackness ans are always sucking off black fighters fawk them and you too you lmfao!
      Or... maybe I know golovkin just sucks.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
        B-Hop went down to their requested weights! He didn't drag them up to 160! De La Hoya was 155, and Hopkins was 156! Trinidad was 158.5, Hopkins was 157!

        October 1, 2001:

        Many talented boxers before Bernard Hopkins have stepped into the ring against Felix Trinidad with what they believed was the sure plan for victory. Oscar De La Hoya, Pernell Whitaker, Fernando Vargas, to name just a few. None before Hopkins on Saturday night, however, had executed their strategy so brilliantly.

        Hopkins, a 36-year-old Philadelphia native who came into the fight as a solid if not huge underdog, dismantled the champion with a masterful combination of strength, quickness, footwork and textbook counterpunching. The end -- and the first loss in Trinidad's 41-fight career -- came 1 minute 18 seconds into the 12th round when Trinidad's father, trainer and manager jumped into the ring to stop the bout with his son struggling to get off the canvas after the only knockdown of the fight.

        https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...=.4a1e8b88029b

        That's the stuff legends are made of! No excuses!
        Your wasting your time on these jack asses. They are saying GGG's opponents are better than FOR sure HOFamers???

        I'll take an Oscar, Trinidad, RJJ, Winky, Calzage over anyone all day every day that GGG has fought and ever will.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by larryxxx.. View Post
          He literally just had a card called "MEXICAN STYLE"

          So ask yourself this Larry why the fawk did your ficticuois lover Floyd only fight on two dates? Both having to do with Mexican history? Floyd is black why didn’t he fight on mlk weekend or the day they abolished slavery? I’m nit racist Larry im just making a point and you and others don’t seem to get it

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
            Like Brook and Vanes???
            Yea, just like that. But I do not think anyone will say those are his best wins/potential win. And that there is the big difference. So your point is what?

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
              I'm sure you have Vanes better than anyone on Hopkins resume as well.... *** you probably have House Arrest Wade better than RJJ in his prime.


              Bunch of dumb ***s out today???

              What is this GGGTarded day???
              You tards can't have it both ways. You can't be slobbing on Canelo's knob all day AND THEN say he's a piece of garbage in the ring. Same goes for Jacobs.

              What real MW did Hopkins beat (or draw with) who was so astoundingly good?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Metho_4u View Post
                Or... maybe I know golovkin just sucks.
                Dude I love ggg but he isn’t this booogey man he has lots of flaws and I know Ward would school him but the double standards on here is fawking amazing: yes he has ******ed fans like ggglovkin or some sh it like that but not all of his fans are on that level.
                His resume sucks and isn’t in Bhops level only an idiot would think that but it’s not as bad as you haters make it sound and you discredit his win over canelo but give hop credit for beating Oscar and tito both smaller men who moved up

                Comment


                • Originally posted by juandabomb View Post
                  oscar and trinidad were at their best at 147, anything beyond that they were fat and slower
                  This.

                  Earth to tards: Oscar was not a real MW.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Bronx2245 View Post
                    B-Hop went down to their requested weights! He didn't drag them up to 160! De La Hoya was 155, and Hopkins was 156! Trinidad was 158.5, Hopkins was 157!

                    October 1, 2001:

                    Many talented boxers before Bernard Hopkins have stepped into the ring against Felix Trinidad with what they believed was the sure plan for victory. Oscar De La Hoya, Pernell Whitaker, Fernando Vargas, to name just a few. None before Hopkins on Saturday night, however, had executed their strategy so brilliantly.

                    Hopkins, a 36-year-old Philadelphia native who came into the fight as a solid if not huge underdog, dismantled the champion with a masterful combination of strength, quickness, footwork and textbook counterpunching. The end -- and the first loss in Trinidad's 41-fight career -- came 1 minute 18 seconds into the 12th round when Trinidad's father, trainer and manager jumped into the ring to stop the bout with his son struggling to get off the canvas after the only knockdown of the fight.

                    https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...=.4a1e8b88029b

                    That's the stuff legends are made of! No excuses!
                    BHop has no pull. Not his fault. It’s not like he was struggling to make weight either. So what’s the big deal? Doesn’t b side always cater to a side? Or is it now some achievement?

                    Comment


                    • Don't fully agree with this quote from him but there is a tiny amount of validity regarding Hopkins opponents but the same can kind of be said about Golokvin as well but I do understand why he's saying it. Considering Hopkins has been bad mouthing him the last three years it's only natural a fighter is going to eventually snap back. If you look up to the lead up of Golovkin V. Lemieux, Hopkins talked so much shh about Golovkin and it never really has stopped, just went more subliminal. Hence why Hopkins was tearing into David post fight in every publication he could.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP