Originally posted by stealthradon
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: GGG: Look at Hopkins; My Record's Much Bigger, Stronger at 160!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by CleneloAlvaroid View PostUh, I know you didn’t mention anyone else. That’s why I had to bring up in Hopkins legendary middleweight resume that he fought Echols and Allen five times.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Chuckguy View PostIt’s hilarious how ggg haters fail to see this.
2. Just because a fighter moves up doesn't mean they aren't "good" at the moved to weight. Seems to be some oblique disqualifier just to make an argument. DLH and Tito are HOF fighters, and Joppy was a champion.
3. BHops record has fighters who were players at the top of the division and proved through their careers that they were tough outs and quality fighters. GGG's best win is Jacobs and his story is unfinished, and GGG's career is as well, but for now, BHop has the better resume.
Comment
-
I look at it like this, If you take GGG and Bh and switch resume would people give Bh credit. BH had Toney , and Prime RJJ around to wait out. I think GGG has no choice now but to go full heel, because his streak is something you can't take away from him but to say that Bh resume is weak is absurd.
Comment
-
I think most of us would pick BHOP to defeat GGG in a match between prime versions. Probably by UD.
But BHOP's competition at 160 was very unimpressive.
Comment
-
Comment