which are the 8 divisions pac won a world title in EXACTLY?

[bambam182]

So who should have manny fought at 126 and 140?

Who were the #1 fighters at 126 and 140?

Who beat Barrera at 126 and hatton at 140?


How are the wbo/wbc/ibf/wba credible titles? All evidence points to them being nothing more than props with no real rules in place for rankings, contenders, etc. It has been proven in court.

Do you actually think boxing isn’t corrupt and the sanctioning bodies are legit and credible?

since your new to boxing and dont know ****, you would know that marquez had the WBA and IBF at 126 and whipped mannys ass but got a draw. barrera didnt have a world title. ring magazine is not a world title. thats giving to a fighter who is the lineal champ, YOU DONT NOT HAVE TO BE A WORLD CHAMP TO BE LINEAL, ****** pac-tard. which once again shows your new to boxing.

[bambam182]

How can manny beating David Diaz be a more credible title win than beating Barrera or hatton?

its not. diaz wasnt even a top 5 LW. casamayor was the LINEAL but did not have a world title. if pac was as great as you all make him he would have fought JUAN DIAZ who had 3 world titles. WBA,WBO, and IBF. instead manny being weak fought DAVID diaz who had the WBC, but still a world title.

[bambam182]

He beat Floyd, Floyd is 130 to 152 22 pounds While Manny 112 to 150 thats 38 pounds . Fighter of the Decade

ROFL @ he beat floyd. floyd whipped the ring with manny.

see my point, ****** pac-tards still think pac is undefeated.

[asgarth]

it's pretty easy.
If you are strict and just count the 4 abc belts. pacquiao has belts in 6 different divisons.

If you include the ring belts, which (most of the time) holds more value than the 4 abc belts, he also has belts at 126 and 140.
I also think the fights for the ring belts were also fights for the lineal title, which holds even more value than the ring belt.

So it just comes down to what you consider legit belts, but just for the sake of Argument.
Let's imagine Crawford staying at 140 and vacating all belts, because he doesnt consider them as real belts and doesnt want to pay those fees, but he keeps the ring belt and the lineal title.
If someone then beats Crawford in his next fight and then never fights for one of the abc belts. Should he be considered a champion at 140 or not?

[Sugar Adam Ali]

since your new to boxing and dont know ****, you would know that marquez had the WBA and IBF at 126 and whipped mannys ass but got a draw. barrera didnt have a world title. ring magazine is not a world title. thats giving to a fighter who is the lineal champ, YOU DONT NOT HAVE TO BE A WORLD CHAMP TO BE LINEAL, ****** pac-tard. which once again shows your new to boxing.

its not. diaz wasnt even a top 5 LW. casamayor was the LINEAL but did not have a world title. if pac was as great as you all make him he would have fought JUAN DIAZ who had 3 world titles. WBA,WBO, and IBF. instead manny being weak fought DAVID diaz who had the WBC, but still a world title.

So who should have manny fought at 126 and 140?

Who beat Barrera and hatton for their belts?




So you give credit to manny being a 154 champ?


How are wbo/wbc/wba/ibf more credible than ring rankings or media outlets?

[McNulty]

Ok, how are those credible?

Who were the champs that manny should have fought instead to become a world champion at 126 and 140?

Why do you keep repeating that last sentence that like a parakeet? You said 2 sentences so many times in this thread I've lost count. How many times are you going to say it before you actually go and look for yourself man??? PAc fans are so lazy! You even want us to prove your point with zero work lmao!!!

You're not getting an answer because nobody remembers who held those titles at that time. Do this, open your browser and check for yourself!

Look man, let me just stop you right here and give you the real 411.

95% of Manny's was cherry picked. Look at his biggest names starting with MAB and Morales. Manny was injected after MAB.Morales 2 and if you look in history, fighters that fight trilogies leave parts of themselves in the ring. By the time Manny got MAB and Morales, they weren't the same. Even in the Morales rematch, look at Erik when he fought Rahim right before, utterly shot.

Every big name he beat were on career shattering losing streaks or career shattering losses. The only guy besides Diaz that wasn't on a losing streak on his rise to fame and power was JMM and we saw he went life and death.

Manny is a great fighter, but the match-making from Bruce Trampler (Top Rank) is the real reason why he's such a household name. They got his best names at their weakest.

No need to look up anything, the Manny mystique is about as real as the tooth fairy.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

it's pretty easy.
If you are strict and just count the 4 abc belts. pacquiao has belts in 6 different divisons.

If you include the ring belts, which (most of the time) holds more value than the 4 abc belts, he also has belts at 126 and 140.
I also think the fights for the ring belts were also fights for the lineal title, which holds even more value than the ring belt.

So it just comes down to what you consider legit belts, but just for the sake of Argument.
Let's imagine Crawford staying at 140 and vacating all belts, because he doesnt consider them as real belts and doesnt want to pay those fees, but he keeps the ring belt and the lineal title.
If someone then beats Crawford in his next fight and then never fights for one of the abc belts. Should he be considered a champion at 140 or not?

Good post.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

no pac-tard can answer this, they run from the question. NAME THE 8 divisions that pac has won a WORLD TITLE in???

WBC 112
IBF 122
Lineal 126
Lineal/WBC 130
WBC 135
Lineal 140
WBO x3 147
WBC 154

He’s an 8 weight world champion... get over it.

[Gigantes]

Hahahahahaha


Look at this idiot




So if Barrera and hatton weren’t the champs at 126 and 140, then name the champs


Quit being a boxrec Warrior, you sound like a fool


Did you even watch boxing then?

no need to feed the troll, you've already defeated with the troll with the first post you put

[Gigantes]

it's pretty easy.
If you are strict and just count the 4 abc belts. pacquiao has belts in 6 different divisons.

If you include the ring belts, which (most of the time) holds more value than the 4 abc belts, he also has belts at 126 and 140.
I also think the fights for the ring belts were also fights for the lineal title, which holds even more value than the ring belt.

So it just comes down to what you consider legit belts, but just for the sake of Argument.
Let's imagine Crawford staying at 140 and vacating all belts, because he doesnt consider them as real belts and doesnt want to pay those fees, but he keeps the ring belt and the lineal title.
If someone then beats Crawford in his next fight and then never fights for one of the abc belts. Should he be considered a champion at 140 or not?

great post. all boils down to people's agenda's. bam bam bigolow is just a ****** troll so no one should even bother with what that pos has to say. again, nice post