Comments Thread For: Daily Bread Mailbag: Canelo-Charlo, Khan-Broner, GGG-Vanes

[TonyGe]

Another great column by Breadman, I agree Vanes not an easy fight and only bashed by GGG haters. He was supposed to fight Sulecki, before the polish fighter pulled out to fight Jacobs. He was favored to beat Sulecki because he was in with much better competition, draw with Lara, many people thought he beat Charlo. Polish guy undefeated against nobodies, but nobody complained about Jacobs picking a 154 pounder. jacobs should have taken that Polish guy out, he’s just not the same after going 12 rounds with GGG. Jacobs gets 2 easy touches after GGG and looks gunshy after getting dropped by GGG and punched hard for 12 rounds. He needed sunglasses at the post fight Presser and now doesn’t have the fire that he did against Quillin. Quillin was much better than these last 2 opponents and Jacobs now very cautious after tasting GGG power. GGG should beat Vanes, but won’t be as easy as the haters making it out to be. Breadman knows it’s not easy to change opponents in the middle of camp and Vanes a very hungry and dangerous guy if GGG not 100% focused. Funnt how Stomps got called out, looks like he will be little stomp now. Good thing they only tested Canelo hair for Clem as they didn’t want to end his career. Probably was the meat, but what was he doing before eating that big Mexican Cow? Hope that rematch happens in Sept with continuous testing and we can see what Canelo body looks like then.

Agreed I don't see the self appointment so called Justice Warriors ragging on Jacobs. I'm glad Danny won but these idiots don't say a word about his opponent selection.

[aboutfkntime]

when Canelo did not sign to fight his mando Golovkin:
tard1: how disgraceful
tard2: what a coward
tard3: how disrespectful to the sport
tard4: strip that boy


when Golovkin did not sign to fight his mando Derevyanchenko:
tard1: Derevyanchenko needs to earn his shot
tard2: Golovkin can do whatever he wants
tard3: Vanes beat Lara doe
tard4: I love Gennady

[aboutfkntime]

when Canelo did not sign to fight his mando Golovkin:
tard1: how disgraceful
tard2: what a coward
tard3: how disrespectful to the sport
tard4: strip that boy


when Golovkin did not sign to fight his mando Derevyanchenko:
tard1: Derevyanchenko needs to earn his shot
tard2: Golovkin can do whatever he wants
tard3: Vanes beat Lara doe
tard4: I love Gennady

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/CoDp6NnSmItoY/200.gif[/IMG]

[TonyGe]

[IMG]https://media.*****.com/media/CoDp6NnSmItoY/200.gif[/IMG]

Your reduced to answering your own posts.. Dude take a vacation.

[tokon]

Let's "see who's tougher". Jeesus! are you 12 years old? Do you actually have fist fights about opinions? You are ****** and childish. You might actually have a couple of fans on this forum, just because it is about the most infantile forum on the internet, but I would guess that most readers of the Breadman have the very appropriate opinion that you are a low life, brutish, idiot. And no, I won't meet you at the fights because I'm not a ****** child.

Have a nice day!

These posts are pure dope man, hilarious!
Thanks.

[aboutfkntime]

Your reduced to answering your own posts.. Dude take a vacation.

which one are you ?

I am guessing tard4 lol

when Canelo did not sign to fight his mando Golovkin:
tard1: how disgraceful
tard2: what a coward
tard3: how disrespectful to the sport
tard4: strip that boy


when Golovkin did not sign to fight his mando Derevyanchenko:
tard1: Derevyanchenko needs to earn his shot
tard2: Golovkin can do whatever he wants
tard3: Vanes beat Lara doe
tard4: I love Gennady

[TonyGe]

which one are you ?

I am guessing tard4 lol

Love might be a bit over the top but
I enjoy watching him fight. So yeah Tard4 works.

[daggum]

manny is on peds cause he didn't sue malignaggi? where does this guy come up with his moronic arguments? from boxingscene?

you really can't see the difference between suing floyd and paulie. no one pays attention to paulie. thats a ****** argument. thats like saying why didnt he sue larry on boxingscene cause he said he was on peds.

[daggum]

when Canelo did not sign to fight his mando Golovkin:
tard1: how disgraceful
tard2: what a coward
tard3: how disrespectful to the sport
tard4: strip that boy


when Golovkin did not sign to fight his mando Derevyanchenko:
tard1: Derevyanchenko needs to earn his shot
tard2: Golovkin can do whatever he wants
tard3: Vanes beat Lara doe
tard4: I love Gennady

i think you are confusing yourself and making false equivalencies.

the ggg-derev fight was not mandated yet. the canelo-ggg fight was. canelo paid ggg not to fight him cause that fight had been ordered. the ggg-derev fight was not ordered until like 2 days ago. the ggg-vanes fight was a voluntary and the ibf allowed it. gggs mandatory wasnt ordered till this fight was signed. you are already revising history that literally just happened.

if ggg does drop the belt and fight someone like canelo or saunders he will be dropping the belt to fight someone better. canelo dropped the belt to fight liam smith. these are the same how???

ggg has never paid derev to step aside but he can do that now to fight someone like canelo or saunders. once again this would be completely different then what canelo did since canelo fought guys like khan and liam smith. ggg would be fighting better fighters than derev and for more money. canelo did the opposite. he fought worse fighters in smaller fights.

[aboutfkntime]

manny is on peds cause he didn't sue malignaggi? where does this guy come up with his moronic arguments? from boxingscene?

you really can't see the difference between suing floyd and paulie. no one pays attention to paulie. thats a ****** argument. thats like saying why didnt he sue larry on boxingscene cause he said he was on peds.

Paulie was a commentator, and he was telling the WORLD

he was way more vocal than Mayweather

that " lawsuit " completely prevented any form of negotiation

they were not trying to avoid negotiating with Paulie