Nope - I sure don't. But I have a basic understanding of how to analyze findings, and apply them to real-world scenarios. I also don't have a shady history like Conte, who easily could have a bias in his reasoning for such staunch supporting of hair-testing.
The fact that a test under controlled conditions, showed such huge variations, and in some cases, detecting absolutely nothing at all, tells me that hair testing for Clen isn't exactly a "game-changer."
Moreover, the fact that the test was administered so late after the failed test dates, casts even more doubt.
All I have, just like you, is an opinion. What we believe really doesn't matter - as the NSAC has spoken. BANNED.



hahahah
I know you guys have crazy corruption down there but please, tell me who you think in the NSAC is going to risk their job and prison time to rig this hair test (which wasn't even necessary) after they already tried to have him suspended for a whole year. Please tell me.
Comment